IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i1p116-d61931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Differences in Correlates of Daily Walking among Middle Age and Older Australian Rural Adults: Implications for Health Promotion

Author

Listed:
  • James Dollman

    (Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, CEA-14, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide 5001, SA, Australia)

  • Melissa Hull

    (Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, CEA-14, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide 5001, SA, Australia)

  • Nicole Lewis

    (Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, CEA-14, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide 5001, SA, Australia)

  • Suzanne Carroll

    (Spatial Epidemiology and Evaluation Research Group, Centre for Population Health Research, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, IPC CWE-48, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide 5001, SA, Australia)

  • Dorota Zarnowiecki

    (School of Health Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, SA, Australia)

Abstract

Rural Australians are less physically active than their metropolitan counterparts, and yet very little is known of the candidate intervention targets for promoting physical activity in rural populations. As rural regions are economically, socially and environmentally diverse, drivers of regular physical activity are likely to vary between regions. This study explored the region-specific correlates of daily walking among middle age and older adults in rural regions with contrasting dominant primary industries. Participants were recruited through print and electronic media, primary care settings and community organisations. Pedometers were worn by 153 adults for at least four days, including a weekend day. A questionnaire identified potential intra-personal, social and environmental correlates of physical activity, according to a social ecological framework. Regression modelling identified independent correlates of daily walking separately in the two study regions. In one region, there were independent correlates of walking from all levels of the social ecological framework. In the other region, significant correlates of daily walking were almost all demographic (age, education and marital status). Participants living alone were less likely to be physically active regardless of region. This study highlights the importance of considering region-specific factors when designing strategies for promoting regular walking among rural adults.

Suggested Citation

  • James Dollman & Melissa Hull & Nicole Lewis & Suzanne Carroll & Dorota Zarnowiecki, 2016. "Regional Differences in Correlates of Daily Walking among Middle Age and Older Australian Rural Adults: Implications for Health Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:116-:d:61931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/1/116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/1/116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giles-Corti, Billie & Donovan, Robert J., 2002. "The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1793-1812, June.
    2. Tahna Pettman & Anthea Magarey & Nadia Mastersson & Annabelle Wilson & James Dollman, 2014. "Improving weight status in childhood: results from the eat well be active community programs," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(1), pages 43-50, February.
    3. Brownson, R.C. & Chang, J.J. & Eyler, A.A. & Ainsworth, B.E. & Kirtland, K.A. & Saelens, B.E. & Sallis, J.F., 2004. "Measuring the Environment for Friendliness Toward Physical Activity: A Comparison of the Reliability of 3 Questionnaires," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(3), pages 473-483.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Belinda C. Goodwin & Arlen K. Rowe & Fiona Crawford-Williams & Peter Baade & Suzanne K. Chambers & Nicholas Ralph & Joanne F. Aitken, 2020. "Geographical Disparities in Screening and Cancer-Related Health Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicoleta Cutumisu & John C. Spence, 2012. "Sport Fields as Potential Catalysts for Physical Activity in the Neighbourhood," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Schaefer-McDaniel, Nicole & O'Brien Caughy, Margaret & O'Campo, Patricia & Gearey, Wayne, 2010. "Examining methodological details of neighbourhood observations and the relationship to health: A literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 277-292, January.
    3. José Antonio Serrano-Sanchez & Angela Lera-Navarro & Cecilia Dorado-García & Juan José González-Henriquez & Joaquin Sanchis-Moysi, 2012. "Contribution of Individual and Environmental Factors to Physical Activity Level among Spanish Adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-10, June.
    4. Jonmenjoy Barman & Somenath Halder & Jayanta Das & Syed Sadath Ali & Fahdah Falah Ben Hasher & Rukhsana & Mohamed Zhran, 2024. "Sustainable Ecotourism Suitability Assessment Using the Intergraded TOPSIS Model in the State of Mizoram, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-31, December.
    5. Stafford, Mai & Cummins, Steven & Ellaway, Anne & Sacker, Amanda & Wiggins, Richard D. & Macintyre, Sally, 2007. "Pathways to obesity: Identifying local, modifiable determinants of physical activity and diet," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(9), pages 1882-1897, November.
    6. Stephanie A. Prince & Elizabeth A. Kristjansson & Katherine Russell & Jean-Michel Billette & Michael Sawada & Amira Ali & Mark S. Tremblay & Denis Prud’homme, 2011. "A Multilevel Analysis of Neighbourhood Built and Social Environments and Adult Self-Reported Physical Activity and Body Mass Index in Ottawa, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-26, October.
    7. McDonald, Noreen C., 2005. "Children’s Travel: Patterns and Influences," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt51c9m01c, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Mohammad Paydar & Asal Kamani Fard & Verónica Gárate Navarrete, 2023. "Design Characteristics, Visual Qualities, and Walking Behavior in an Urban Park Setting," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Razieh Zandieh & Javier Martinez & Johannes Flacke, 2019. "Older Adults’ Outdoor Walking and Inequalities in Neighbourhood Green Spaces Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Alba Martínez-García & Eva María Trescastro-López & María Eugenia Galiana-Sánchez & Pamela Pereyra-Zamora, 2019. "Data Collection Instruments for Obesogenic Environments in Adults: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Peter Barlow & Sean Lyons & Anne Nolan, 2021. "How Perceived Adequacy of Open Public Space Is Related to Objective Green Space and Individuals’ Opinions of Area-Level Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Denise Alexander & Michael Rigby & Mika Gissler & Lennart Köhler & Morag MacKay, 2015. "The challenge of compiling data profiles to stimulate local preventive health action: a European case study from child safety," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(4), pages 449-456, May.
    13. Shrestha, Samjhana & Kestens, Yan & Thomas, Frédérique & El Aarbaoui, Tarik & Chaix, Basile, 2019. "Spatial access to sport facilities from the multiple places visited and sport practice: Assessing and correcting biases related to selective daily mobility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Lei Peng & Ruiying Jia, 2023. "Exploring the Interplay of the Physical Environment and Organizational Climate in Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Trish Muzenda & Maylene Shung-King & Estelle Victoria Lambert & Anna Brugulat Panés & Amy Weimann & Nicole McCreedy & Lambed Tatah & Clarisse Mapa-Tassou & Ishtar Govia & Vincent Were & Tolu Oni, 2022. "Three Growth Spurts in Global Physical Activity Policies between 2000 and 2019: A Policy Document Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Dan Andersson & Lina Wahlgren & Karin Sofia Elisabeth Olsson & Peter Schantz, 2023. "Pedestrians’ Perceptions of Motorized Traffic Variables in Relation to Appraisals of Urban Route Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-27, February.
    17. John Sessions & Ge Yu & Martin Wall, 2011. "Social Capital and Health: A Longitudinal Analysis from the British Household Panel Survey," Department of Economics Working Papers 6/11, University of Bath, Department of Economics.
    18. Niamh K Shortt & Esther Rind & Jamie Pearce & Richard Mitchell, 2014. "Integrating Environmental Justice and Socioecological Models of Health to Understand Population-Level Physical Activity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(6), pages 1479-1495, June.
    19. Manuela Peters & Tiara Ratz & Frauke Wichmann & Sonia Lippke & Claudia Voelcker-Rehage & Claudia R. Pischke, 2022. "Ecological Predictors of Older Adults’ Participation and Retention in a Physical Activity Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Lyndall Strazdins & Amy L Griffin & Dorothy H Broom & Cathy Banwell & Rosemary Korda & Jane Dixon & Francesco Paolucci & John Glover, 2011. "Time Scarcity: Another Health Inequality?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(3), pages 545-559, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:116-:d:61931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.