IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i11p1079-d82081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Dog- and Cat-Induced Injury on Incidence and Risk Factors among Children

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Chen

    (Center for Injury Prevention Research, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China)

  • Yang Gao

    (Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China)

  • Li Zhou

    (Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Yafei Tan

    (Center for Injury Prevention Research, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China)

  • Liping Li

    (Center for Injury Prevention Research, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China)

Abstract

Background: Millions of people are bitten by animals each year, with approximately 90% of the injuries being caused by dogs and cats. However, few studies focus on risk factors of dog- and cat-induced injury in China. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the rate of dog- and cat-induced injury and its potential risk factors. Methods: The data were from a population-based cross-sectional study conducted in 2015, with a sample of 9380 children 6–19 years of age from two cities, Shenzhen (large city) and Shantou (mid-sized city), in southern China. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify the risk factors of injury by dogs and cats. Results: The total rates of dog and cat-induced injury were 15.1% and 8.7% during the lifetime, and 3.4% and 1.7% during the past year, respectively. Dog bites mostly occurred in the dog’s residence (49.4%). Cat scratches were more likely to be inflicted by one’s own cat (47.5%). Children living in suburban and island county had 2.83 times and 2.53 times more dog-related injuries than central urban children, respectively. After stratification by cities, injuries in Shantou were correlated with non-single child families (OR (odds ratios), 1.46; 95% CI (95% confidence interval), 1.09–1.96) and raising cats (OR, 5.34; 95% CI, 3.88–7.35). Those who disliked animals (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45–0.88) or had good academic performance (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35–0.60) had lower risk for injury. Injuries in Shenzhen were related to the mother’s educational level (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.11–2.07) and mother being a migrant worker (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.12–3.94). Conclusions: Family factors were important to predict dog- and cat-induced injury among children from Shenzhen, and personal factors were closely associated with injury among children form Shantou.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Chen & Yang Gao & Li Zhou & Yafei Tan & Liping Li, 2016. "A Comparative Study of Dog- and Cat-Induced Injury on Incidence and Risk Factors among Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1079-:d:82081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1079/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1079/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yafei Tan & Di Ma & Ying Chen & Fuyuan Cheng & Xiangxiang Liu & Liping Li, 2015. "Relationships between Sleep Behaviors and Unintentional Injury in Southern Chinese School-Aged Children: A Population-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yafei Tan & Ying Chen & Yaogui Lu & Liping Li, 2016. "Exploring Associations between Problematic Internet Use, Depressive Symptoms and Sleep Disturbance among Southern Chinese Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Sha Ma & Minmin Jiang & Feng Wang & Jingjing Lu & Lu Li & Therese Hesketh, 2019. "Left-Behind Children and Risk of Unintentional Injury in Rural China—A Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-9, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1079-:d:82081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.