Author
Listed:
- Jianping Yang
(Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
Department of Occupational Health, Baoan Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518100, China)
- Qinzhi Wei
(Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China)
- Xiaochun Peng
(South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Guangzhou 510655, China)
- Xiaowu Peng
(South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Guangzhou 510655, China)
- Jianhui Yuan
(Department of Toxicology, Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen 518055, China)
- Dalin Hu
(Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China)
Abstract
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)—A well known gasoline additive substituting for lead alkyls—causes lipid disorders and liver dysfunctions in animal models. However, whether MTBE exposure is a risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains uncertain. We evaluate the possible relationship between MTBE exposure and the prevalence of NAFLD among 71 petrol station attendants in southern China. The personal exposure concentrations of MTBE were analyzed by Head Space Solid Phase Microextraction GC/MS. NAFLD was diagnosed by using abdominal ultrasonography according to the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD suggested by the Chinese Hepatology Association. Demographic and clinical characteristics potentially associated with NAFLD were investigated. Mutivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to measure odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The result showed that the total prevalence of NAFLD was 15.49% (11/71) among the study subjects. The average exposure concentrations of MTBE were 292.98 ± 154.90 μg/m 3 and 286.64 ± 122.28 μg/m 3 in NAFLD and non-NAFLD groups, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between them ( p > 0.05). After adjusting for age, gender, physical exercise, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), white blood cell (WBC), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL), the odds ratios were 1.31 (95% CI: 0.85–1.54; p > 0.05), 1.14 (95% CI: 0.81–1.32; p > 0.05), 1.52 (95% CI: 0.93–1.61; p > 0.05) in the groups (including men and women) with exposure concentrations of MTBE of 100–200 μg/m 3 , 200–300 μg/m 3 , and ≥300 μg/m 3 , respectively, as compared to the group (including men and women) ≤100 μg/m 3 . Our investigation indicates that exposure to MTBE does not seem to be a significant risk factor for the prevalence of NAFLD among petrol station attendants in southern China.
Suggested Citation
Jianping Yang & Qinzhi Wei & Xiaochun Peng & Xiaowu Peng & Jianhui Yuan & Dalin Hu, 2016.
"Relationship between Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Exposure and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study among Petrol Station Attendants in Southern China,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-9, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:10:p:946-:d:78792
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Xiangjing Gao & Peng Wang & Yong Hu & Yiyao Cao & Weiming Yuan & Yuqing Luan & Changjian Quan & Zhen Zhou & Hua Zou, 2023.
"Exposure Concentrations and Inhalation Risk of Submicron Particles in a Gasoline Station—A Pilot Study,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
- Andrew Watterson, 2016.
"Occupational Safety and Related Impacts on Health and the Environment,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-4, October.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:10:p:946-:d:78792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.