Author
Listed:
- Peng Kang
(Institute of Military Health Management, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Rd, 200433, Shanghai, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Bihan Tang
(Institute of Military Health Management, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Rd, 200433, Shanghai, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Yuan Liu
(Institute of Military Health Management, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Rd, 200433, Shanghai, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Xu Liu
(Institute of Military Health Management, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Rd, 200433, Shanghai, China)
- Zhipeng Liu
(Institute of Military Health Management, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Rd, 200433, Shanghai, China)
- Yipeng Lv
(Institute of Military Health Management, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Rd, 200433, Shanghai, China)
- Lulu Zhang
(Institute of Military Health Management, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Rd, 200433, Shanghai, China)
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to investigate medical efforts and injury profiles of victims of the Lushan earthquake admitted to three military hospitals. This study retrospectively investigated the clinical records of 266 admitted patients evacuated from the Lushan earthquake area. The 2005 version of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS-2005) was used to identify the severity of each injury. Patient demographic data, complaints, diagnoses, injury types, prognosis, means of transportation, and cause of injury were all reviewed individually. The statistical analysis of the study was conducted primarily using descriptive statistics. Of the 266 patients, 213 (80.1%) were admitted in the first two days. A total of 521 injury diagnoses were recorded in 266 patients. Earthquake-related injuries were primarily caused by buildings collapsing (38.4%) and victims being struck by objects (33.8%); the most frequently injured anatomic sites were the lower extremities and pelvis (34.2%) and surface area of the body (17.9%). Fracture (41.5%) was the most frequent injury, followed by soft tissue injury (27.5%), but crush syndrome was relatively low (1.2%) due to the special housing structures in the Lushan area. The most commonly used procedure was suture and dressings (33.7%), followed by open reduction and internal fixation (21.9%).The results of this study help formulate recommendations to improve future disaster relief and emergency planning in remote, isolated, and rural regions of developing countries.
Suggested Citation
Peng Kang & Bihan Tang & Yuan Liu & Xu Liu & Zhipeng Liu & Yipeng Lv & Lulu Zhang, 2015.
"Medical Efforts and Injury Patterns of Military Hospital Patients Following the 2013 Lushan Earthquake in China: A Retrospective Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:9:p:10723-10738:d:55061
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Jacopo Del Papa & Pierpaolo Vittorini & Francesco D’Aloisio & Mario Muselli & Anna Rita Giuliani & Alfonso Mascitelli & Leila Fabiani, 2019.
"Retrospective Analysis of Injuries and Hospitalizations of Patients Following the 2009 Earthquake of L’Aquila City,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
- Wu, Yangyang & Chen, Suren, 2023.
"Resilience modeling and pre-hazard mitigation planning of transportation network to support post-earthquake emergency medical response,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:9:p:10723-10738:d:55061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.