IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i7p8480-8497d52914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupant Interactions and Effectiveness of Natural Ventilation Strategies in Contemporary New Housing in Scotland, UK

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Sharpe

    (Mackintosh Environmental Architecture Research Unit, Glasgow School of Art, 167 Renfrew Street, Glasgow G3 6RQ, UK)

  • Paul Farren

    (ASSIST Design Architects, 100 Kerr Street, Glasgow G40 2QP, UK)

  • Stirling Howieson

    (ESRU/Department of Architecture, University of Strathclyde, James Weir Building, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK)

  • Paul Tuohy

    (ESRU/Department of Architecture, University of Strathclyde, James Weir Building, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK)

  • Jonathan McQuillan

    (Anderson Bell Christie, 382 Great Western Road, Glasgow G4 9HT, UK)

Abstract

The need to reduce carbon emissions and fuel poverty has led to increased building envelope air tightness, intended to reduce uncontrolled ventilation heat losses. Ventilation strategies in dwellings still allow the use of trickle ventilators in window frames for background ventilation. The extent to which this results in “healthy” Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) in recently constructed dwellings was a concern of regulators in Scotland. This paper describes research to explore this. First a review of literature was conducted, then data on occupant interactions with ventilation provisions (windows, doors, trickle vents) gathered through an interview-based survey of 200 recently constructed dwellings, and measurements made on a sample of 40 of these. The main measured parameter discussed here is CO 2 concentration. It was concluded after the literature review that 1000 ppm absolute was a reasonable threshold to use for “adequate” ventilation. The occupant survey found that there was very little occupant interaction with the trickle ventilators e.g., in bedrooms 63% were always closed, 28% always open, and in only 9% of cases occupants intervened to make occasional adjustments. In the measured dwellings average bedroom CO 2 levels of 1520 ppm during occupied (night time) hours were observed. Where windows were open the average bedroom CO 2 levels were 972 ppm. With windows closed, the combination of “trickle ventilators open plus doors open” gave an average of 1021 ppm. “Trickle ventilators open” gave an average of 1571 ppm. All other combinations gave averages of 1550 to 2000 ppm. Ventilation rates and air change rates were estimated from measured CO 2 levels, for all dwellings calculated ventilation rate was less than 8 L/s/p, in 42% of cases calculated air change rate was less than 0.5 ach. It was concluded that trickle ventilation as installed and used is ineffective in meeting desired ventilation rates, evidenced by high CO 2 levels reported across the sampled dwellings. Potential implications of the results are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Sharpe & Paul Farren & Stirling Howieson & Paul Tuohy & Jonathan McQuillan, 2015. "Occupant Interactions and Effectiveness of Natural Ventilation Strategies in Contemporary New Housing in Scotland, UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:7:p:8480-8497:d:52914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/7/8480/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/7/8480/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adam Pollard & Tim Jones & Stephen Sherratt & Richard A. Sharpe, 2019. "Use of Simple Telemetry to Reduce the Health Impacts of Fuel Poverty and Living in Cold Homes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Marie-Eve Levasseur & Patrick Poulin & Céline Campagna & Jean-Marc Leclerc, 2017. "Integrated Management of Residential Indoor Air Quality: A Call for Stakeholders in a Changing Climate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:7:p:8480-8497:d:52914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.