Author
Listed:
- J. Alfredo Bonilla
(Oceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA
Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, River Fall, WI 54022, USA)
- Tonya D. Bonilla
(Oceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA
Corporate Research Materials Laboratory, St. Paul, MN 55144, USA)
- Amir M. Abdelzaher
(Oceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA
Department of Civil, Arch., and Environmental Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33126, USA)
- Troy M. Scott
(Oceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA
Hydros Coastal Solutions, Inc.-Miami, FL 33126, USA)
- Jerzy Lukasik
(BCS Laboratories, Inc., Gainesville FL 32609, USA)
- Helena M. Solo-Gabriele
(Oceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA
Department of Civil, Arch., and Environmental Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33126, USA)
- Carol J. Palmer
(Oceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA
BioStar Consulting, Inc., Greenbrier, TN 37073, USA)
Abstract
Large sample volumes are traditionally required for the analysis of waterborne pathogens. The need for large volumes greatly limits the number of samples that can be processed. The aims of this study were to compare extraction and detection procedures for quantifying protozoan parasites and viruses from small volumes of marine water. The intent was to evaluate a logistically simpler method of sample collection and processing that would facilitate direct pathogen measures as part of routine monitoring programs. Samples were collected simultaneously using a bilayer device with protozoa capture by size (top filter) and viruses capture by charge (bottom filter). Protozoan detection technologies utilized for recovery of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. were qPCR and the more traditional immunomagnetic separation—IFA-microscopy, while virus (poliovirus) detection was based upon qPCR versus plaque assay. Filters were eluted using reagents consistent with the downstream detection technologies. Results showed higher mean recoveries using traditional detection methods over qPCR for Cryptosporidium (91% vs. 45%) and poliovirus (67% vs. 55%) whereas for Giardia the qPCR-based methods were characterized by higher mean recoveries (41% vs. 28%). Overall mean recoveries are considered high for all detection technologies. Results suggest that simultaneous filtration may be suitable for isolating different classes of pathogens from small marine water volumes. More research is needed to evaluate the suitability of this method for detecting pathogens at low ambient concentration levels.
Suggested Citation
J. Alfredo Bonilla & Tonya D. Bonilla & Amir M. Abdelzaher & Troy M. Scott & Jerzy Lukasik & Helena M. Solo-Gabriele & Carol J. Palmer, 2015.
"Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:7:p:7118-7132:d:51628
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Samuel Dorevitch, 2015.
"Health Effects of Waterborne Contaminants: A Focus on Emerging Concerns,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-3, October.
- Jean-Baptiste Burnet & Leslie Ogorzaly & Christian Penny & Henry-Michel Cauchie, 2015.
"Fine-Scale Spatial Heterogeneity in the Distribution of Waterborne Protozoa in a Drinking Water Reservoir,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, September.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:7:p:7118-7132:d:51628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.