IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i6p7002-7016d51271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Knowledge, Beliefs and Behavior on Antibiotic Use and Self-Medication in Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Eglė Pavydė

    (Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus Str. 9, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania)

  • Vincentas Veikutis

    (Institute of Microbiology and Virology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 49264, Lithuania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Asta Mačiulienė

    (Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 50161, Lithuania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Vytautas Mačiulis

    (Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 50161, Lithuania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kęstutis Petrikonis

    (Department of Neurology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 50161, Lithuania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Edgaras Stankevičius

    (Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus Str. 9, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania)

Abstract

Irrational antibiotic use has led society to antibiotic resistance—a serious health problem worldwide. This study aimed to assess public knowledge, beliefs, and behavior concerning antibiotic use and self-medication in Lithuania. The cross-sectional survey method was processed using a validated questionnaire in different regions of Lithuania. In total, 1005 adults completed the questionnaire and were included in the study. More than half of the respondents (61.1%) had poor knowledge of antibiotics. Almost half of the respondents incorrectly identified antibiotics as being effective either against viral (26.0%) or mixed (bacterial and viral) infections (21.7%). The respondents with lower educational qualifications (OR = 2.515; 95% CI 1.464–4.319; p = 0.001) and those from rural areas (OR = 1.765; 95% CI 1.041–2.991; p = 0.035) were significantly less knowledgeable of antibiotics. There was no significant difference between genders, different age groups, or different parenthood status. The determined level of self–medication with antibiotics was 31.0%. The men (OR = 1.650; 95% CI 1.120–2.430; p = 0.011), the respondents from rural areas (OR = 2.002; 95% CI 1.343–2.985; p = 0.001), and those without children (OR = 2.428; 95% CI 1.477–3.991; p < 0.001) were more likely to use antibiotics in self-medication. Lithuanian residents’ knowledge of antibiotics is insufficient. More information about antibiotic use should be provided by physicians and pharmacists. Self-medication with antibiotics is a serious problem in Lithuania and requires considerable attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Eglė Pavydė & Vincentas Veikutis & Asta Mačiulienė & Vytautas Mačiulis & Kęstutis Petrikonis & Edgaras Stankevičius, 2015. "Public Knowledge, Beliefs and Behavior on Antibiotic Use and Self-Medication in Lithuania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:6:p:7002-7016:d:51271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/6/7002/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/6/7002/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria-Manuel Azevedo & Céline Pinheiro & John Yaphe & Fátima Baltazar, 2013. "Assessing the Impact of a School Intervention to Promote Students’ Knowledge and Practices on Correct Antibiotic Use," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Machowska & Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg, 2018. "Drivers of Irrational Use of Antibiotics in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:6:p:7002-7016:d:51271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.