IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i6p6319-6332d50528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment of Fungal Contamination in Indoor Air Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Senthaamarai Rogawansamy

    (Occupational and Environmental Hygiene Laboratory, Discipline of Public Health, School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sharyn Gaskin

    (Occupational and Environmental Hygiene Laboratory, Discipline of Public Health, School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Michael Taylor

    (Occupational and Environmental Hygiene Laboratory, Discipline of Public Health, School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
    Health and Environment, School of the Environment, Flinders University, South Australia 5042, Australia)

  • Dino Pisaniello

    (Occupational and Environmental Hygiene Laboratory, Discipline of Public Health, School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia)

Abstract

Fungal contamination in indoor environments has been associated with adverse health effects for the inhabitants. Remediation of fungal contamination requires removal of the fungi present and modifying the indoor environment to become less favourable to growth. This may include treatment of indoor environments with an antifungal agent to prevent future growth. However there are limited published data or advice on chemical agents suitable for indoor fungal remediation. The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacies of five commercially available cleaning agents with published or anecdotal use for indoor fungal remediation. The five agents included two common multi-purpose industrial disinfectants (Cavicide ® and Virkon ® ), 70% ethanol, vinegar (4.0%-4.2% acetic acid), and a plant-derived compound (tea tree ( Melaleuca alternifolia ) oil) tested in both a liquid and vapour form. Tea tree oil has recently generated interest for its antimicrobial efficacy in clinical settings, but has not been widely employed for fungal remediation. Each antifungal agent was assessed for fungal growth inhibition using a disc diffusion method against a representative species from two common fungal genera, ( Aspergillus fumigatus and Penicillium chrysogenum ), which were isolated from air samples and are commonly found in indoor air. Tea tree oil demonstrated the greatest inhibitory effect on the growth of both fungi, applied in either a liquid or vapour form. Cavicide ® and Virkon ® demonstrated similar, although less, growth inhibition of both genera. Vinegar (4.0%–4.2% acetic acid) was found to only inhibit the growth of P. chrysogenum , while 70% ethanol was found to have no inhibitory effect on the growth of either fungi. There was a notable inhibition in sporulation, distinct from growth inhibition after exposure to tea tree oil, Virkon ® , Cavicide ® and vinegar. Results demonstrate that common cleaning and antifungal agents differ in their capacity to inhibit the growth of fungal genera found in the indoor air environment. The results indicate that tea tree oil was the most effective antifungal agent tested, and may have industrial application for the remediation of fungal contamination in residential and occupational buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Senthaamarai Rogawansamy & Sharyn Gaskin & Michael Taylor & Dino Pisaniello, 2015. "An Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment of Fungal Contamination in Indoor Air Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:6:p:6319-6332:d:50528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/6/6319/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/6/6319/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhijian Liu & Hao Li & Guoqing Cao, 2017. "Quick Estimation Model for the Concentration of Indoor Airborne Culturable Bacteria: An Application of Machine Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Rita Reale & Laura Medeghini & Michela Botticelli, 2024. "Stealing from Phytotherapy—Heritage Conservation with Essential Oils: A Review, from Remedy to Sustainable Restoration Product," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:6:p:6319-6332:d:50528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.