IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i12p14976-15181d59679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) to the Evaluation of Feeding Practices Behaviors, and Its Associations with Infant Health Risk in Rural Lhasa, Tibet

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenjie Wang

    (Institute of Population Research/WHO Collaborating Center on Reproductive Health and Population Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Shaonong Dang

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Yuan Xing

    (Xi’an Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Qiang Li

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Hong Yan

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

Abstract

To evaluate the status of feeding practices and analyze the association between feeding practice and health status among Tibetan infants, a cross-sectional survey of 386 women with children aged under 24 months was conducted in rural areas surrounding Lhasa, Tibet. All participants were selected using simple random sampling and were interviewed face-to-face by trained interviewers. Mothers were interviewed to collect information on their feeding practices. A feeding practices index was created using the rank sum ratio method. Most of the infants had been or were being breastfed at the time of the interview. The feeding practices index was significantly and inversely associated with the prevalence of acute upper respiratory infection, and the odds ratio for the qualified feeding practices index vs. the non-qualified feeding practices index was 0.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.20–0.94). There were no measurable associations observed between acute upper respiratory infection, diarrhea, and the feeding practices index after controlling for selected factors. The method of rank sum ratio provides a flexible way to evaluate feeding practices and is easy to understand. Furthermore, appropriate infant feeding practices might play a protective role in Tibetan infants’ health.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenjie Wang & Shaonong Dang & Yuan Xing & Qiang Li & Hong Yan, 2015. "Applying Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) to the Evaluation of Feeding Practices Behaviors, and Its Associations with Infant Health Risk in Rural Lhasa, Tibet," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:12:p:14976-15181:d:59679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/12/14976/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/12/14976/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunzhu Wei & Pablo Cabrera-Barona & Thomas Blaschke, 2016. "Local Geographic Variation of Public Services Inequality: Does the Neighborhood Scale Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Tongze Han & Ping Liu & Changlin Niu & Qiangnian Li, 2023. "Evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the Chinese case," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8419-8446, August.
    3. Lili Zhang & Guofang Xing & Zhenyu Liu & Yanqing Zhang & Hongbo Li & Yuanmeng Wang & Jiaxin Lu & Nan An & Zhihong Zhao & Zeyu Wang & Yuanhuai Han & Qingliang Cui, 2024. "Screening and Evaluation of Biomechanical Properties and Morphological Characteristics of Peduncles in Foxtail Millet," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:12:p:14976-15181:d:59679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.