IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i10p13118-13130d57378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Akiko Edagawa

    (Division of Environment Health, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Osaka 537-0025, Japan
    Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan)

  • Akio Kimura

    (Division of Planning and Coordination, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Osaka 537-0025, Japan)

  • Takako Kawabuchi-Kurata

    (Division of Virology, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Osaka 537-0025, Japan)

  • Shinichi Adachi

    (Division of Environment Health, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Osaka 537-0025, Japan)

  • Katsunori Furuhata

    (School of Life and Environmental Science, Azabu University, Kanagawa 252-5201, Japan)

  • Hiroshi Miyamoto

    (Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan)

Abstract

We investigated Legionella contamination in bath water samples, collected from 68 bathing facilities in Japan, by culture, culture with amoebic co-culture, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and real-time qPCR with amoebic co-culture. Using the conventional culture method, Legionella pneumophila was detected in 11 samples (11/68, 16.2%). Contrary to our expectation, the culture method with the amoebic co-culture technique did not increase the detection rate of Legionella (4/68, 5.9%). In contrast, a combination of the amoebic co-culture technique followed by qPCR successfully increased the detection rate (57/68, 83.8%) compared with real-time qPCR alone (46/68, 67.6%). Using real-time qPCR after culture with amoebic co-culture, more than 10-fold higher bacterial numbers were observed in 30 samples (30/68, 44.1%) compared with the same samples without co-culture. On the other hand, higher bacterial numbers were not observed after propagation by amoebae in 32 samples (32/68, 47.1%). Legionella was not detected in the remaining six samples (6/68, 8.8%), irrespective of the method. These results suggest that application of the amoebic co-culture technique prior to real-time qPCR may be useful for the sensitive detection of Legionella from bath water samples. Furthermore, a combination of amoebic co-culture and real-time qPCR might be useful to detect viable and virulent Legionella because their ability to invade and multiply within free-living amoebae is considered to correlate with their pathogenicity for humans. This is the first report evaluating the efficacy of the amoebic co-culture technique for detecting Legionella in bath water samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Akiko Edagawa & Akio Kimura & Takako Kawabuchi-Kurata & Shinichi Adachi & Katsunori Furuhata & Hiroshi Miyamoto, 2015. "Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:10:p:13118-13130:d:57378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/10/13118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/10/13118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:10:p:13118-13130:d:57378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.