IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i5p5541-5554d36347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Qualitative Investigation of Adolescents’ Perceived Mechanisms of Change from a Universal School-Based Depression Prevention Program

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Shochet

    (School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia)

  • Roslyn Montague

    (New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry, Sydney 2145, Australia)

  • Coral Smith

    (School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia)

  • Mark Dadds

    (School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

Abstract

A recent meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the universal application of school-based prevention programs for adolescent depression. The mechanisms underlying such successful interventions, however, are largely unknown. We report on a qualitative analysis of 109 Grade 9 students’ beliefs about what they gained from an evidence-based depression prevention intervention, the Resourceful Adolescent Program (RAP-A). Fifty-four percent of interviewees articulated at least one specific example of program benefit. A thematic analysis of responses revealed two major themes, improved interpersonal relationships and improved self-regulation, both stronger than originally assumed. A more minor theme also emerged—more helpful cognitions. It is postulated that both improved interpersonal relationships and improved self-regulation are likely to enhance one another, and more helpful cognitions may express its contribution through enhanced self-regulation. These findings broaden our understanding of the impact of depression prevention programs, beginning to illuminate how such programs benefit participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Shochet & Roslyn Montague & Coral Smith & Mark Dadds, 2014. "A Qualitative Investigation of Adolescents’ Perceived Mechanisms of Change from a Universal School-Based Depression Prevention Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:5:p:5541-5554:d:36347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/5/5541/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/5/5541/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:5:p:5541-5554:d:36347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.