IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i5p5170-5207d36071.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Chen

    (School of Information Systems and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
    Jiangxi Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanchang 330029, China)

  • David Hailey

    (School of Information Systems and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia)

  • Ning Wang

    (National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Ping Yu

    (School of Information Systems and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia)

Abstract

High quality data and effective data quality assessment are required for accurately evaluating the impact of public health interventions and measuring public health outcomes. Data, data use, and data collection process, as the three dimensions of data quality, all need to be assessed for overall data quality assessment. We reviewed current data quality assessment methods. The relevant study was identified in major databases and well-known institutional websites. We found the dimension of data was most frequently assessed. Completeness, accuracy, and timeliness were the three most-used attributes among a total of 49 attributes of data quality. The major quantitative assessment methods were descriptive surveys and data audits, whereas the common qualitative assessment methods were interview and documentation review. The limitations of the reviewed studies included inattentiveness to data use and data collection process, inconsistency in the definition of attributes of data quality, failure to address data users’ concerns and a lack of systematic procedures in data quality assessment. This review study is limited by the coverage of the databases and the breadth of public health information systems. Further research could develop consistent data quality definitions and attributes. More research efforts should be given to assess the quality of data use and the quality of data collection process.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Chen & David Hailey & Ning Wang & Ping Yu, 2014. "A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-38, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:5:p:5170-5207:d:36071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/5/5170/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/5/5170/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Anastasios Michailidis & Christos Karelakis & Yannis Fallas & Aikaterini Paltaki, 2023. "What Makes Farmers Aware in Adopting Circular Bioeconomy Practices? Evidence from a Greek Rural Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Syed Mustafa Ali & Farah Naureen & Arif Noor & Maged N. Kamel Boulos & Javariya Aamir & Muhammad Ishaq & Naveed Anjum & John Ainsworth & Aamna Rashid & Arman Majidulla & Irum Fatima, 2018. "Data Quality: A Negotiator between Paper-Based and Digital Records in Pakistan’s TB Control Program," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Agatha Ravi Vidiasratri & Lisdrianto Hanindriyo & Caroline Manuela Hartanto, 2024. "Charting the Future of Oral Health: A Bibliometric Exploration of Quality-of-Life Research in Dentistry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-15, February.
    4. David Naranjo-Gil & María Jesús Sánchez-Expósito & Laura Gómez-Ruiz, 2016. "Traditional vs. Contemporary Management Control Practices for Developing Public Health Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:5:p:5170-5207:d:36071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.