Author
Listed:
- Richard W.Seidel
(Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 2017 South Jefferson Street, Roanoke, VA 24014, USA
Fralin Translational Obesity Research Center, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 215 War Memorial Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Kimberlee A. Pardo
(Fralin Translational Obesity Research Center, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 215 War Memorial Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Paul A.Estabrooks
(Fralin Translational Obesity Research Center, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 215 War Memorial Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, 101 Elm Avenue, Roanoke, VA 24013, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- WenYou
(Fralin Translational Obesity Research Center, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 215 War Memorial Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Department of Agriculture and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 321A Hutcheson Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Sarah S. Wall
(Fralin Translational Obesity Research Center, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 215 War Memorial Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Brenda M.Davy
(Fralin Translational Obesity Research Center, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 215 War Memorial Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Fabio A.Almeida
(Fralin Translational Obesity Research Center, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 215 War Memorial Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify patient preferences for different components of a local diabetes prevention program that would improve reach. A secondary purpose was to determine if patient characteristics were related to program preferences. Methods: Participants were identified through electronic medical records from two family medicine clinics in Virginia. Participants completed a mailed survey addressing demographics, economic status, risk factors for diabetes, and preferences regarding diabetes prevention interventions—delivery mode, program length, and duration. Results: Twenty-nine percent of eligible participants responded (n = 142); 83% of participants were at risk for diabetes and 82% had a household income <$20,000. When presented with the choice between a class-based vs. a technology-based program, 83% preferred a technology-based program. Whites were less likely to choose the technology-based program, with no significant differences based on age, education, income, or gender. Conclusions: Contrary to beliefs that lower income individuals may not use technology-based interventions, lower socioeconomic patients indicated a preference for a technology- and telephone-supported diabetes prevention program over in-person class approaches. Findings provide formative data to support the design of a patient-centered, technology-enhanced diabetes prevention program in a real-world setting, thereby increasing potential participation and reach.
Suggested Citation
Richard W.Seidel & Kimberlee A. Pardo & Paul A.Estabrooks & WenYou & Sarah S. Wall & Brenda M.Davy & Fabio A.Almeida, 2014.
"Beginning A Patient-Centered Approach in the Design of A Diabetes Prevention Program,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:2003-2013:d:32939
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Katz, D.L. & Murimi, M. & Gonzalez, A. & Njike, V. & Green, L.W., 2011.
"From controlled trial to community adoption: The multisite translational community trial,"
American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(8), pages 17-27.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:2003-2013:d:32939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.