IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i10p10606-10621d41187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential Transferability of Economic Evaluations of Programs Encouraging Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents across Different Countries—A Systematic Review of the Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Korber

    (Munich School of Management and Munich Center of Health Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich 80539, Germany
    Institute for Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH)—German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg 85764, Germany)

Abstract

Physical inactivity is an increasing problem. Owing to limited financial resources, one method of getting information on the cost-effectiveness of different types of prevention programs is to examine existing programs and their results. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the transferability of cost-effectiveness results of physical activity programs for children and adolescents to other contexts. Based on a systematic review of the literature, the transferability of the studies found was assessed using a sub-checklist of the European Network of Health Economic Evaluation Databases (EURONHEED). Thirteen studies of different physical activity interventions were found and analyzed. The results for transferability ranged from “low” to “very high”. A number of different factors influence a program’s cost-effectiveness ( i.e ., discount rate, time horizon, etc. ). Therefore, transparency with regard to these factors is one fundamental element in the transferability of the results. A major point of criticism is that transferability is often limited because of lack of transparency. This paper is the first to provide both an overview and an assessment of transferability of economic evaluations of existing programs encouraging physical activity in children and adolescents. This allows decision makers to gain an impression on whether the findings are transferable to their decision contexts, which may lead to time and cost savings.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Korber, 2014. "Potential Transferability of Economic Evaluations of Programs Encouraging Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents across Different Countries—A Systematic Review of the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:10:p:10606-10621:d:41187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/10/10606/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/10/10606/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hege Urdahl & Andrea Manca & Mark Sculpher, 2006. "Assessing Generalisability in Model-Based Economic Evaluation Studies," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 1181-1197, December.
    2. Silke B. Wolfenstetter & Christina M. Wenig, 2010. "Economic Evaluation and Transferability of Physical Activity Programmes in Primary Prevention: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. F. El Masri & E. Sapin de Brosses & K. Rhissassi & W. Skalli & D. Mitton, 2012. "Apparent Young's modulus of vertebral cortico-cancellous bone specimens," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 23-28.
    2. Rachael Fleurence & Cynthia Iglesias & Jeanene Johnson, 2007. "The Cost Effectiveness of Bisphosphonates for the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 913-933, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:10:p:10606-10621:d:41187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.