Author
Listed:
- Kyung-Hwa Choi
(Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Dankook University, 119 Dandae-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, Chungnam 330-714, Korea)
- Mina Ha
(Department of Preventive Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, 119 Dandae-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, Chungnam 330-714, Korea)
- Won Jin Lee
(Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-701, Korea)
- Seung-Sik Hwang
(Department Preventive Medicine, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Nam-gu, Incheon 402-751, Korea)
- Meeseon Jeong
(Radiation Health Research Institute, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. Ltd., Wooichun-ro 308, Dobong-gu, Seoul 132-703, Korea)
- Young-Woo Jin
(Radiation Health Research Institute, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. Ltd., Wooichun-ro 308, Dobong-gu, Seoul 132-703, Korea)
- Hyeog Ju Kim
(Radiation Safety Division, Korea Food & Drug Administration, 187 Osongsaengmyeong2-ro, Cheongwon-gun, Chungbuk 363-700, Korea)
- Kwang-Yong Lee
(Radiation Safety Division, Korea Food & Drug Administration, 187 Osongsaengmyeong2-ro, Cheongwon-gun, Chungbuk 363-700, Korea)
- Jung-Eun Lee
(Radiation Safety Division, Korea Food & Drug Administration, 187 Osongsaengmyeong2-ro, Cheongwon-gun, Chungbuk 363-700, Korea)
- Jong-Won Kang
(Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, 52 Naesudong-ro, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk 361-763, Korea)
- Heon Kim
(Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, 52 Naesudong-ro, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk 361-763, Korea)
Abstract
This study was aimed to examine the association between the effective radiation dose of diagnostic radiation workers in Korea and their risk for cancer. A total of 36,394 diagnostic radiation workers (159,189 person-years) were included in this study; the effective dose and cancer incidence were analyzed between the period 1996 and 2002. Median (range) follow-up time was 5.5 (0.04–7) years in males and 3.75 (0.04–7) years in females. Cancer risk related to the average annual effective dose and exposure to more than 5 mSv of annual radiation dose were calculated by the Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for occupation and age at the last follow-up. The standardized incidence ratio of cancer in radiation workers showed strong healthy worker effects in both male and female workers. The relative risk of all cancers from exposure of the average annual effective dose in the highest quartile (upper 75% or more of radiation dose) was 2.14 in male workers (95% CI: 1.48–3.10, p -trend: <0.0001) and 4.43 in female workers (95% CI: 2.17–9.04, p -trend: <0.0001), compared to those in the lower three quartiles of radiation exposure dose (less than upper 75% of radiation dose). Cancer risks of the brain (HR: 17.38, 95% CI: 1.05–287.8, p -trend: 0.04) and thyroid (HR: 3.88, 95% CI: 1.09–13.75, p -trend: 0.01) in female workers were significantly higher in the highest quartile group of radiation exposure compared to those in the lower three quartiles, and the risk of colon and rectum cancers in male workers showed a significantly increasing trend according to the increase of the average annual radiation dose (HR: 2.37, 95% CI: 0.99–5.67, p -trend: 0.02). The relative risk of leukemia in male workers and that of brain cancer in female workers were significantly higher in the group of people who had been exposed to more than 5 mSv/year than those exposed to less than 5 mSv/year (HR: 11.75, 95% CI: 1.08–128.20; HR: 63.11, 95% CI: 3.70–1,075.00, respectively). Although the present study involved a relatively young population and a short follow-up time, statistically significant increased risks of some cancers in radiation workers were found, which warrants a longer follow-up study and more intensive protective measures in this population.
Suggested Citation
Kyung-Hwa Choi & Mina Ha & Won Jin Lee & Seung-Sik Hwang & Meeseon Jeong & Young-Woo Jin & Hyeog Ju Kim & Kwang-Yong Lee & Jung-Eun Lee & Jong-Won Kang & Heon Kim, 2013.
"Cancer Risk in Diagnostic Radiation Workers in Korea from 1996–2002,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p:314-327:d:22774
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p:314-327:d:22774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.