IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v10y2013i11p5781-5806d30136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overview of Evidence in Prevention and Aetiology of Food Allergy: A Review of Systematic Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline J. Lodge

    (Centre for MEGA Epidemiology, the University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, Victoria 2010, Australia)

  • Katrina J. Allen

    (Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
    Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Childrens Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052 Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Adrian J. Lowe

    (Centre for MEGA Epidemiology, the University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, Victoria 2010, Australia
    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Shyamali C. Dharmage

    (Centre for MEGA Epidemiology, the University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, Victoria 2010, Australia
    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia)

Abstract

The worldwide prevalence of food allergy appears to be increasing. Early life environmental factors are implicated in the aetiology of this global epidemic. The largest burden of disease is in early childhood, where research efforts aimed at prevention have been focused. Evidence synthesis from good quality systematic reviews is needed. We performed an overview of systematic reviews concerning the prevention and aetiology of food allergy, retrieving 14 systematic reviews, which covered three broad topics: formula (hydrolysed or soy) for the prevention of food allergy or food sensitization; maternal and infant diet and dietary supplements for the prevention of food allergy or food sensitization and hygiene hypothesis-related interventions. Using the AMSTAR criteria for assessment of methodological quality, we found five reviews to be of high quality, seven of medium quality and two of low quality. Overall we found no compelling evidence that any of the interventions that had been systematically reviewed were related to the risk of food allergy. Updating of existing reviews, and production of new systematic reviews, are needed in areas where evidence is emerging for interventions and environmental associations. Furthermore, additional primary studies, with greater numbers of participants and objective food allergy definitions are urgently required.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline J. Lodge & Katrina J. Allen & Adrian J. Lowe & Shyamali C. Dharmage, 2013. "Overview of Evidence in Prevention and Aetiology of Food Allergy: A Review of Systematic Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:11:p:5781-5806:d:30136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/11/5781/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/11/5781/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:11:p:5781-5806:d:30136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.