IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgeogr/v5y2025i1p3-d1570834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Support for Flood Risk Management: Insights from an Italian Alpine Survey Using Systems Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Rocco Scolozzi

    (Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy)

  • Anna Scolobig

    (Equity and Justice Group, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
    Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Marco Borga

    (Department of Land Environment Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

This study presents the results of a survey on flood risk awareness conducted in the Italian Alps, examining the impacts of a major weather event on public perception and trust. It develops a systems-thinking framework to analyse dynamic feedback loops influencing flood risk management support over time. The survey data collection overlapped with a severe storm event in Central Europe, the storm “Adrian” (also known as “Vaia”). This provided a unique pre- and post-event perspective. Results highlight the critical role of individual knowledge, trust in authorities, and social group dynamics in shaping risk perception processes. The study shows how major weather events can change perceptions, sense of safety, and institutional trust within local communities, and more interestingly, these changes can vary spatially. The findings are summarised using a systems-thinking framework, which helps to identify possible feedback loops between flood risk management interventions and long-term public support. The study emphasizes the importance of forward-looking, systems-thinking approaches in the design, monitoring, and evaluation of flood risk management plans. These approaches allow one to account for often-overlooked dynamics, such as spatially varying feedback loops and counter-intuitive effects, ultimately improving the long-term effectiveness of flood risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Rocco Scolozzi & Anna Scolobig & Marco Borga, 2025. "Public Support for Flood Risk Management: Insights from an Italian Alpine Survey Using Systems Thinking," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:5:y:2025:i:1:p:3-:d:1570834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/5/1/3/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/5/1/3/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:5:y:2025:i:1:p:3-:d:1570834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.