IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgeogr/v3y2023i1p6-129d1037024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Earthquake and Moisture Effects on Rockfall-Runouts Using 3D Models and Orthorectified Aerial Photos

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Al-Shaar

    (Geography Department, CREEMO (Centre de Recherche en Environnement-Espace Méditerranée Orientale), Saint-Joseph University, Campus des Sciences Humaines, Rue de Damas, Mar Mikhael, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon)

  • Pierre-Charles Gérard

    (Geography Department, CREEMO (Centre de Recherche en Environnement-Espace Méditerranée Orientale), Saint-Joseph University, Campus des Sciences Humaines, Rue de Damas, Mar Mikhael, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon)

  • Ghaleb Faour

    (National Center for Remote Sensing, National Council for Scientific Research (CNRS), Beirut 1107 2260, Lebanon)

  • Walid Al-Shaar

    (Geography Department, CREEMO (Centre de Recherche en Environnement-Espace Méditerranée Orientale), Saint-Joseph University, Campus des Sciences Humaines, Rue de Damas, Mar Mikhael, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon)

  • Jocelyne Adjizian-Gérard

    (Geography Department, CREEMO (Centre de Recherche en Environnement-Espace Méditerranée Orientale), Saint-Joseph University, Campus des Sciences Humaines, Rue de Damas, Mar Mikhael, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon)

Abstract

Rockfall hazard gains popularity nowadays among researchers in different scientific fields, decision-makers and urban planners. The assessment of rockfall hazard requires detection, mapping and estimating the maximum travel distance that rock boulders may reach, commonly known as “rockfall runout”. This latter can change significantly under the effects of different triggering factors such as soil conditions, chemical, physical and geological rock properties. However, comparing and analyzing these different effects represents, to the best of our knowledge, one of the newest scientific challenges that need to be addressed. This paper presents a complete methodologic approach aiming to assess the rockfall hazard through runout estimation in three different conditions: (i) gravity, (ii) earthquakes, and (iii) the presence of moisture along the slope. The “Mtein” Village and its surrounding areas in the Mount Lebanon region were chosen as the study area because there have been numerous historic rockfalls and various-sized rocks, such as cobbles and boulders, scattered throughout the area. Thus, three-dimensional simulations were conducted using the Rockyfor3D software and aerial photos for the year 1999 to assess the rockfall runout, the energy curves, and the number of deposited rocks. The results reveal that earthquakes have the highest triggering effect on rockfall and that moisture has a damping effect on RFs by decreasing the kinetic energy. The study shows the importance of taking into consideration the influence of triggering factors as well as rock density on rockfall runout and hazard.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Al-Shaar & Pierre-Charles Gérard & Ghaleb Faour & Walid Al-Shaar & Jocelyne Adjizian-Gérard, 2023. "Comparison of Earthquake and Moisture Effects on Rockfall-Runouts Using 3D Models and Orthorectified Aerial Photos," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:6-129:d:1037024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/3/1/6/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/3/1/6/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Al-Shaar & Pierre-Charles Gerard & Ghaleb Faour & Walid Al-Shaar & Jocelyne Adjizian-Gérard, 2024. "A Comprehensive Approach to Quantitative Risk Assessment of Rockfalls on Buildings Using 3D Model of Rockfall Runout," J, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Hartwig H. Hochmair & Gerhard Navratil & Haosheng Huang, 2023. "Perspectives on Advanced Technologies in Spatial Data Collection and Analysis," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-5, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:6-129:d:1037024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.