IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgames/v14y2023i6p67-d1266257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On a Special Two-Person Dynamic Game

Author

Listed:
  • Akio Matsumoto

    (Department of Economics, Chuo University, 742-1 Higashi-Nakano, Tokyo 192-0393, Japan)

  • Ferenc Szidarovszky

    (Department of Mathematics, Corvinus University, Föván tur 8, 1093 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Maryam Hamidi

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Lamar University, 2210 Cherry Engineering Building, Beaumort, TX 77710, USA)

Abstract

The asymptotical properties of a special dynamic two-person game are examined under best-response dynamics in both discrete and continuos time scales. The direction of strategy changes by the players depend on the best responses to the strategies of the competitors and on their own strategies. Conditions are given first for the local asymptotical stability of the equilibrium if instantaneous data are available to the players concerning all current strategies. Next, it is assumed that only delayed information is available about one or more strategies. In the discrete case, the presence of delays has an effect on only the order of the governing difference equations. Under continuous scales, several possibilities are considered: each player has a delay in the strategy of its competitor; player 1 has identical delays in both strategies; the players have identical delays in their own strategies; player 1 has different delays in both strategies; and the players have different delays in their own strategies. In all cases, it is assumed that the equilibrium is asymptotically stable without delays, and we examine how delays can make the equilibrium unstable. For small delays, the stability is preserved. In the cases of one-delay models, the critical value of the delay is determined when stability changes to instability. In the cases of two and three delays, the stability-switching curves are determined in the two-dimensional space of the delays, where stability becomes lost if the delay pair crosses this curve. The methodology is different for the one-, two-, and three-delay cases outlined in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Akio Matsumoto & Ferenc Szidarovszky & Maryam Hamidi, 2023. "On a Special Two-Person Dynamic Game," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:14:y:2023:i:6:p:67-:d:1266257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/14/6/67/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/14/6/67/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akio Matsumoto & Ferenc Szidarovszky, 2016. "Game Theory and Its Applications," Springer Books, Springer, edition 1, number 978-4-431-54786-0, March.
    2. Farebrother, R W, 1973. "Simplified Samuelson Conditions for Cubic and Quartic Equations," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 41(4), pages 396-400, December.
    3. Akio Matsumoto & Ferenc Szidarovszky, 2018. "Dynamic Oligopolies with Time Delays," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-13-1786-6, March.
    4. Luca Gori & Luca Guerrini & Mauro Sodini, 2014. "Hopf Bifurcation in a Cobweb Model with Discrete Time Delays," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-8, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akio Matsumoto & Ferenc Szidarovszky, 2021. "Delay dynamics in nonlinear monopoly with gradient adjustment," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 533-557, December.
    2. Frank Bodendorf & Barbara Hollweck & Jörg Franke, 2022. "Information Asymmetry in Business-to-Business Negotiations: A Game Theoretical Approach to Support Purchasing Decisions with Suppliers," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 723-745, August.
    3. Jaylson Jair da Silveira & Gilberto Tadeu Lima, 2017. "Employee Profit-sharing and Labor Extraction in a Classical Model of Distribution and Growth," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 613-635, October.
    4. S. Kabaivanov & V. Zhelinski & B. Zlatanov, 2021. "Coupled Fixed Points for Hardy-Rogers Type of Maps and Their Applications in the Investigations of Market Equilibrium in Duopoly Markets for Non-Differentiable, Nonlinear Response Functions," Papers 2110.01496, arXiv.org.
    5. F. Cavalli & A. Naimzada & M. Pireddu, 2017. "An evolutive financial market model with animal spirits: imitation and endogenous beliefs," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 1007-1040, November.
    6. Gilberto Tadeu Lima & Jaylson Jair da Silveira, 2018. "Macrodynamic Implications of Employee Profit Sharing as Effort Elicitation Device," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2018_02, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    7. Akio Matsumoto & Ferenc Szidarovszky & Keiko Nakayama, 2020. "Delay Cournot Duopoly Game with Gradient Adjustment: Berezowski Transition from a Discrete Model to a Continuous Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Huang, Kevin X.D. & Meng, Qinglai & Xue, Jianpo, 2009. "Is forward-looking inflation targeting destabilizing? The role of policy's response to current output under endogenous investment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 409-430, February.
    9. Lines, Marji & Westerhoff, Frank, 2010. "Inflation expectations and macroeconomic dynamics: The case of rational versus extrapolative expectations," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 246-257, February.
    10. Gilberto Tadeu Lima & Jaylson Jair da Silveira, 2020. "Macroeconomic performance under evolutionary dynamics of employee profit-sharing," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 8(4), pages 589–615-5, October.
    11. Lines Marji & Westerhoff Frank, 2012. "Effects of Inflation Expectations on Macroeconomic Dynamics: Extrapolative Versus Regressive Expectations," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 1-30, October.
    12. Matsumoto, Akio & Szidarovszky, Ferenc, 2022. "The chaotic monopolist revisited with bounded rationality and delay dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Cavalli, Fausto & Naimzada, Ahmad K. & Pecora, Nicolò, 2019. "Complex interplay between monetary and fiscal policies in a real economy model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 318-330.
    14. Akio Matsumoto & Ferenc Szidarovszky, 2020. "Delay Stability of n -Firm Cournot Oligopolies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Cano Berlanga, Sebastian & Vilella, Cori, 2017. "Attribution models and the Cooperative Game Theory," Working Papers 2072/290758, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    16. Gilberto Tadeu Lima & Jaylson Jair Silveira, 2021. "Evolutionary microdynamics of employee profit sharing as productivity-enhancing device," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 417-449, April.
    17. Ahmad Naimzada & Marina Pireddu, 2014. "Real and financial interacting oscillators: a behavioral macro-model with animal spirits," Working Papers 268, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2014.
    18. Laura Ajeti & Atanas Ilchev & Boyan Zlatanov, 2022. "On Coupled Best Proximity Points in Reflexive Banach Spaces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Dufour, Jean-Marie & Neifar, Malika, 2002. "Méthodes d’inférence exactes pour des processus autorégressifs : une approche fondée sur des tests induits," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 78(1), pages 19-40, Mars.
    20. Yulia Dzhabarova & Stanimir Kabaivanov & Margarita Ruseva & Boyan Zlatanov, 2020. "Existence, Uniqueness and Stability of Market Equilibrium in Oligopoly Markets," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-32, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:14:y:2023:i:6:p:67-:d:1266257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.