IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v17y2024i1p1-d1551516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Survey of Centralised and Decentralised Identity Management Systems: Analysing Scalability, Security, and Feasibility

Author

Listed:
  • Aviral Goel

    (Institute for Digital Technologies, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Yogachandran Rahulamathavan

    (Institute for Digital Technologies, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

Abstract

Traditional identity management (IdM) solutions based on centralised protocols, such as Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML), are where a central authority manages all the processes. This risks a single point of failure and other vulnerabilities. In response, decentralised techniques like blockchain and decentralised identities (DIDs) are being explored. This review paper performs a comparison of popular decentralised identity management (DIM) protocols, such as self-sovereign identity (SSI), against traditional centralised approaches such as LDAP and SAML. These decentralised identity management systems are being developed, keeping users’ identity data as its highest priority. Additionally, this method eliminates the need for a central authority to manage and secure the system. To further explore the potential of decentralised identity management, this study delves into popular blockchain-based decentralised identity management systems such as uPort, Sovrin, EverID, Blockstack, ShoCard, and Hyperledger Indy. We analyse their underlying principles and compare them with the well-established centralised identity management solutions, focusing on key aspects such as scalability, security, and feasibility. However, despite their benefits and several worthy developments in this field, decentralised approaches are still not widely used. Through this study, we investigate both centralised and decentralised methods and review their strengths and weaknesses. By reviewing multiple research papers, this survey aims to provide an understanding and aid in selecting the most suitable identity management system for different use cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Aviral Goel & Yogachandran Rahulamathavan, 2024. "A Comparative Survey of Centralised and Decentralised Identity Management Systems: Analysing Scalability, Security, and Feasibility," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:1-:d:1551516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammed Shuaib & Noor Hafizah Hassan & Sahnius Usman & Shadab Alam & Surbhi Bhatia & Parul Agarwal & Sheikh Mohammad Idrees, 2022. "Land Registry Framework Based on Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) for Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Shuaib & Sumit Badotra & Muhammad Irfan Khalid & Abeer D. Algarni & Syed Sajid Ullah & Sami Bourouis & Jawaid Iqbal & Salil Bharany & Lokesh Gundaboina, 2022. "A Novel Optimization for GPU Mining Using Overclocking and Undervolting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:1-:d:1551516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.