IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v16y2024i6p188-d1401369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studying the Quality of Source Code Generated by Different AI Generative Engines: An Empirical Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Tosi

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy)

Abstract

The advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence is opening essential questions about whether and when AI will replace human abilities in accomplishing everyday tasks. This issue is particularly true in the domain of software development, where generative AI seems to have strong skills in solving coding problems and generating software source code. In this paper, an empirical evaluation of AI-generated source code is performed: three complex coding problems (selected from the exams for the Java Programming course at the University of Insubria) are prompted to three different Large Language Model (LLM) Engines, and the generated code is evaluated in its correctness and quality by means of human-implemented test suites and quality metrics. The experimentation shows that the three evaluated LLM engines are able to solve the three exams but with the constant supervision of software experts in performing these tasks. Currently, LLM engines need human-expert support to produce running code that is of good quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Tosi, 2024. "Studying the Quality of Source Code Generated by Different AI Generative Engines: An Empirical Evaluation," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:188-:d:1401369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/6/188/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/6/188/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:188-:d:1401369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.