Author
Listed:
- Nick Bray
(Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA)
- Matthew Boeding
(Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA)
- Michael Hempel
(Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA)
- Hamid Sharif
(Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA)
- Tapio Heikkilä
(VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., FI-90571 Oulu, Finland)
- Markku Suomalainen
(VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., FI-90571 Oulu, Finland)
- Tuomas Seppälä
(VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., FI-90571 Oulu, Finland)
Abstract
Telerobotics involves the operation of robots from a distance, often using advanced communication technologies combining wireless and wired technologies and a variety of protocols. This application domain is crucial because it allows humans to interact with and control robotic systems safely and from a distance, often performing activities in hazardous or inaccessible environments. Thus, by enabling remote operations, telerobotics not only enhances safety but also expands the possibilities for medical and industrial applications. In some use cases, telerobotics bridges the gap between human skill and robotic precision, making the completion of complex tasks requiring high accuracy possible without being physically present. With the growing availability of high-speed networks around the world, especially with the advent of 5G cellular technologies, applications of telerobotics can now span a gamut of scenarios ranging from remote control in the same room to robotic control across the globe. However, there are a variety of factors that can impact the control precision of the robotic platform and user experience of the teleoperator. One such critical factor is latency, especially across large geographical areas or complex network topologies. Consequently, military telerobotics and remote operations, for example, rely on dedicated communications infrastructure for such tasks. However, this creates a barrier to entry for many other applications and domains, as the cost of dedicated infrastructure would be prohibitive. In this paper, we examine the network latency of robotic control over shared network resources in a variety of network settings, such as a local network, access-controlled networks through Wi-Fi and cellular, and a remote transatlantic connection between Finland and the United States. The aim of this study is to quantify and evaluate the constituent latency components that comprise the control feedback loop of this telerobotics experience—of a camera feed for an operator to observe the telerobotic platform’s environment in one direction and the control communications from the operator to the robot in the reverse direction. The results show stable average round-trip latency of 6.6 ms for local network connection, 58.4 ms when connecting over Wi-Fi, 115.4 ms when connecting through cellular, and 240.7 ms when connecting from Finland to the United States over a VPN access-controlled network. These findings provide a better understanding of the capabilities and performance limitations of conducting telerobotics activities over commodity networks, and lay the foundation of our future work to use these insights for optimizing the overall user experience and the responsiveness of this control loop.
Suggested Citation
Nick Bray & Matthew Boeding & Michael Hempel & Hamid Sharif & Tapio Heikkilä & Markku Suomalainen & Tuomas Seppälä, 2024.
"A Latency Composition Analysis for Telerobotic Performance Insights Across Various Network Scenarios,"
Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:457-:d:1536765
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:457-:d:1536765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.