IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v14y2022i7p195-d848878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative D-GNSS Aided with Multi Attribute Decision Making Module: A Rigorous Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Thanassis Mpimis

    (School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Theodore T. Kapsis

    (School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Athanasios D. Panagopoulos

    (School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Vassilis Gikas

    (School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Satellite positioning lies within the very core of numerous Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and Future Internet applications. With the emergence of connected vehicles, the performance requirements of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are constantly pushed to their limits. To this end, Cooperative Positioning (CP) solutions have attracted attention in order to enhance the accuracy and reliability of low-cost GNSS receivers, especially in complex propagation environments. In this paper, the problem of efficient and robust CP employing low-cost GNSS receivers is investigated over critical ITS scenarios. By adopting a Cooperative-Differential GNSS (C-DGNSS) framework, the target’s vehicle receiver can obtain Position–Velocity–Time (PVT) corrections from a neighboring vehicle and update its own position in real-time. A ranking module based on multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) algorithms is proposed for the neighboring vehicle rating and optimal selection. The considered MADM techniques are simulated with various weightings, normalization techniques, and criteria associated with positioning accuracy and reliability. The obtained criteria values are experimental GNSS measurements from several low-cost receivers. A comparative and sensitivity analysis are provided by evaluating the MADM algorithms in terms of ranking performance and robustness. The positioning data time series and the numerical results are then presented, and comments are made. Scoring-based and distance-based MADM methods perform better, while L1 RMS, HDOP, and Hz std are the most critical criteria. The multi-purpose applicability of the proposed scheme, not only for land vehicles, is also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Thanassis Mpimis & Theodore T. Kapsis & Athanasios D. Panagopoulos & Vassilis Gikas, 2022. "Cooperative D-GNSS Aided with Multi Attribute Decision Making Module: A Rigorous Comparative Analysis," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:195-:d:848878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/7/195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/7/195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rashmi Munjal & William Liu & Xuejun Li & Jairo Gutierrez & Peter Han Joo Chong, 2022. "Multi-Attribute Decision Making for Energy-Efficient Public Transport Network Selection in Smart Cities," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Tosi, 2022. "Editorial for the Special Issue on “Software Engineering and Data Science”," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-2, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:195-:d:848878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.