IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v12y2020i6p100-d368922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient Privacy Violation Detection in Healthcare Critical Infrastructures: An Investigation Using Density-Based Benchmarking

Author

Listed:
  • William Hurst

    (Department of Computer Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK)

  • Aaron Boddy

    (Aintree Hospital, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK)

  • Madjid Merabti

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE)

  • Nathan Shone

    (Department of Computer Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK)

Abstract

Hospital critical infrastructures have a distinct threat vector, due to (i) a dependence on legacy software; (ii) the vast levels of interconnected medical devices; (iii) the use of multiple bespoke software and that (iv) electronic devices (e.g., laptops and PCs) are often shared by multiple users. In the UK, hospitals are currently upgrading towards the use of electronic patient record (EPR) systems. EPR systems and their data are replacing traditional paper records, providing access to patients’ test results and details of their overall care more efficiently. Paper records are no-longer stored at patients’ bedsides, but instead are accessible via electronic devices for the direct insertion of data. With over 83% of hospitals in the UK moving towards EPRs, access to this healthcare data needs to be monitored proactively for malicious activity. It is paramount that hospitals maintain patient trust and ensure that the information security principles of integrity, availability and confidentiality are upheld when deploying EPR systems. In this paper, an investigation methodology is presented towards the identification of anomalous behaviours within EPR datasets. Many security solutions focus on a perimeter-based approach; however, this approach alone is not enough to guarantee security, as can be seen from the many examples of breaches. Our proposed system can be complementary to existing security perimeter solutions. The system outlined in this research employs an internal-focused methodology for anomaly detection by using the Local Outlier Factor (LOF) and Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) algorithms for benchmarking behaviour, for assisting healthcare data analysts. Out of 90,385 unique IDs, DBSCAN finds 102 anomalies, whereas 358 are detected using LOF.

Suggested Citation

  • William Hurst & Aaron Boddy & Madjid Merabti & Nathan Shone, 2020. "Patient Privacy Violation Detection in Healthcare Critical Infrastructures: An Investigation Using Density-Based Benchmarking," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:100-:d:368922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/12/6/100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/12/6/100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li Qing & Weng Linhong & Ding Xuehai, 2019. "A Novel Neural Network-Based Method for Medical Text Classification," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:100-:d:368922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.