IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i7p1715-d1623612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Factor Carbon Emissions Prediction in Coal-Fired Power Plants: A Machine Learning Approach for Carbon Footprint Management

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaopan Liu

    (Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Haonan Yu

    (Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Hanzi Liu

    (Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Zhiqiang Sun

    (Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

In coal-fired power plants, accurately accounting for carbon footprints is crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and achieving sustainability goals. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a comprehensive approach that expands the scope of carbon accounting, enabling the calculation of carbon emission data. However, the unclear boundary definition and incomplete data types often lead to insufficient accuracy in model calculations and predictive performance. Herein, we developed machine learning models to predict carbon emissions in a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant. The ElasticNet modeling approach demonstrated exceptional predictive accuracy (R 2 = 0.9514; MAE = 435.42 metric tons CO 2 ). Coal combustion constituted the predominant source of greenhouse gas emissions, with quarterly emissions reaching 1.63 million metric tons in Q1 and 1.11 million metric tons in Q3. Emission intensity exhibited remarkable stability across operational load ranges (1.0–1.1 kg/MWh). Notably, under high-load conditions (>70%), low-calorific-value coal generated marginally higher specific emissions (1.11 kg/MWh) compared to high-calorific-value coal (1.05 kg/MWh). The findings provide rational strategies for optimizing coal procurement strategies and environmental control measures, thereby facilitating an optimal balance between operational efficiency and environmental stewardship.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaopan Liu & Haonan Yu & Hanzi Liu & Zhiqiang Sun, 2025. "Multi-Factor Carbon Emissions Prediction in Coal-Fired Power Plants: A Machine Learning Approach for Carbon Footprint Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1715-:d:1623612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1715/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1715/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1715-:d:1623612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.