IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i6p1412-d1611075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation on Energy Enhancement of Shale Oil Imbibition Under Different Fracture Fluid Injection Methods—A Case Investigation of Jimsar Lucaogou Formation

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Zhu

    (Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Fei Wang

    (Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Junchao Wang

    (Oil Production Technology Research Institute, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Zhanjie Li

    (Oil Production Technology Research Institute, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Shicheng Zhang

    (Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

This paper describes an innovatively designed experimental method for fracturing fluid energy storage to explore the energy storage mechanism during the well shut-in process of fractured shale reservoirs. By improving the existing core clamp and adding fracturing fluid cavities and large volume intermediate containers to simulate artificial fractures and remote shale reservoirs, the pressure changes in the core during the well shut-in process were monitored under the conditions of a real oil–water ratio and real pressure distribution to explore the energy storage law of the shut-in fluid in fractured shale reservoirs. Compared to the 0.62 MPa energy storage obtained from traditional energy storage experiments (without artificial fractures or remote shale reservoirs), the experimental scheme proposed in this paper achieved a 2.45 MPa energy storage, consistent with the field’s monitoring results. The energy storage effects of four fracturing fluids were compared, namely pure CO 2 , CO 2 pre-fracturing fluid, slickwater pre-fracturing fluid, and pure slickwater fracturing fluid. Due to the characteristics of a high expansion coefficient and low interfacial tension of pure CO 2 , the energy storage effect was the best, and the pressure equilibrium time was the shortest. Considering factors such as comprehensive economy and energy storage efficiency, the optimal range for CO 2 pre-injection is between 20% and 30%. Based on the optimization criterion of energy storage pressure balance, it is recommended that the optimal CO 2 shut-in time be 5 h and the slickwater be 12.8 h. Considering the economic, sand carrying, and energy storage effects, and other factors, CO 2 pre-storage has the best imbibition effect, and the optimal CO 2 pre-storage range is 20~30%. The research results provide theoretical support for energy storage fracturing construction in other shale oil reservoirs of the same type.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Zhu & Fei Wang & Junchao Wang & Zhanjie Li & Shicheng Zhang, 2025. "Investigation on Energy Enhancement of Shale Oil Imbibition Under Different Fracture Fluid Injection Methods—A Case Investigation of Jimsar Lucaogou Formation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1412-:d:1611075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1412/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1412/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1412-:d:1611075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.