IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i6p1381-d1609845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Overheating Risks in Moderately Insulated Irish Social Housing: Analysis of Building Energy Ratings and Indoor Temperature Profiles

Author

Listed:
  • Fahimehsadat Sajadirad

    (School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, D14 E099 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Richard O’Hegarty

    (School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, D14 E099 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Oliver Kinnane

    (School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, D14 E099 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

As buildings become more energy-efficient in cold climates, the unintended consequence of increased overheating risk during warmer seasons necessitates attention. In this context, there is an absence of research addressing the assessment of overheating risks in residential buildings in Ireland. This study assesses data from a sample of 1100 social housing units in Dublin, the majority of which have a Building Energy Rating (BER) of C, representing moderately insulated dwellings. Using indoor temperature data and outdoor climate reports for 2022, the research evaluates overheating risks based on both static and adaptive criteria in the living room zone of dwellings. The static methods used include the Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE) Guide A and the Passivhaus Institute standard, while adaptive methods follow CIBSE TM59. The findings reveal discrepancies in overheating risk assessments: overall, 4% surpass thresholds under CIBSE Guide A. In contrast, 41% of dwellings exceeded overheating thresholds under the Passivhaus standard during the May to September 2022. Adaptive criteria, however, indicated minimal overheating instances, at 0.4%. These results highlight how different assessment methodologies influence overheating risk conclusions. The impact of this study is two-fold. First it further strengthens existing literature which questions the appropriateness of static methods. Secondly, it shows that the risk of overheating in moderately insulated buildings in this sample set is minimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Fahimehsadat Sajadirad & Richard O’Hegarty & Oliver Kinnane, 2025. "Assessing Overheating Risks in Moderately Insulated Irish Social Housing: Analysis of Building Energy Ratings and Indoor Temperature Profiles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1381-:d:1609845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1381/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Attia, Shady & Shadmanfar, Niloufar & Ricci, Federico, 2020. "Developing two benchmark models for nearly zero energy schools," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shady Attia, 2020. "Spatial and Behavioral Thermal Adaptation in Net Zero Energy Buildings: An Exploratory Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Attia, Shady & Canonge, Théophile & Popineau, Mathieu & Cuchet, Mathilde, 2022. "Developing a benchmark model for renovated, nearly zero-energy, terraced dwellings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    3. Hye-Jin Kim & Do-Young Choi & Donghyun Seo, 2021. "Development and Verification of Prototypical Office Buildings Models Using the National Building Energy Consumption Survey in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Pengying Wang & Shuo Zhang, 2022. "Retrofitting Strategies Based on Orthogonal Array Testing to Develop Nearly Zero Energy Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Li, Tian & Bie, Haipei & Lu, Yi & Sawyer, Azadeh Omidfar & Loftness, Vivian, 2024. "MEBA: AI-powered precise building monthly energy benchmarking approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    6. Yizhe Xu & Chengchu Yan & Hao Qian & Liang Sun & Gang Wang & Yanlong Jiang, 2021. "A Novel Optimization Method for Conventional Primary and Secondary School Classrooms in Southern China Considering Energy Demand, Thermal Comfort and Daylighting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1381-:d:1609845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.