IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i4p839-d1588658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of the Impact of Environmental Degradation on the Transition to Clean Energy: New Evidence from Sultanate of Oman

Author

Listed:
  • Nurcan Kilinc-Ata

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 20, Al Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman
    Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, HSE University, Myasnitskaya Street 20, Moscow 101000, Russia)

Abstract

All nations are searching for ways to address their environmental gaps to assure long-term sustainability, given the alarming rate at which the environment is deteriorating. As one of the nations pursuing clean energy, Oman needs to embrace eco-friendly practices that can encourage sustainability and resource efficiency to establish green ecosystems. This study uses an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model to examine the link between CO 2 emissions, GDP, energy consumption, financial development, foreign direct investment, urbanization, and population in the Sultanate of Oman between 1990 and 2023. The Middle Eastern nation of Oman was selected for the case study because it has traditionally depended on its domestic fossil fuel resources. Furthermore, the country has been a net exporter and surplus oil producer, underscoring Oman’s long-standing reliance on fossil fuels. The findings indicate that urbanization and GDP lower CO 2 emissions, whereas population growth, energy use, FDI, and financial development raise emissions. As per the EKC model, the GDP2 coefficient was 0.488 and β 1 < 0. This suggests that there is a positive correlation between environmental degradation and economic growth in Oman, although the EKC only applies up to a particular income level. The findings suggest enacting additional environmental regulations to support sustainable business behavior, raising public understanding of environmental issues, using more clean energy technologies, lowering energy consumption, and reaching the goal of net-zero carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurcan Kilinc-Ata, 2025. "Investigation of the Impact of Environmental Degradation on the Transition to Clean Energy: New Evidence from Sultanate of Oman," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:839-:d:1588658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/4/839/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/4/839/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Desbordes, Rodolphe & Wei, Shang-Jin, 2017. "The effects of financial development on foreign direct investment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 153-168.
    2. Abednego Osei, 2025. "Investing for a greener future: unpacking the dual impact of FDI on carbon emissions and the transformative role of renewable energy," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Wang, Wei-Zheng & Liu, Lan-Cui & Liao, Hua & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2021. "Impacts of urbanization on carbon emissions: An empirical analysis from OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Perron, Pierre & Phillips, Peter C. B., 1987. "Does GNP have a unit root? : A re-evaluation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 139-145.
    5. Kilinc-Ata, Nurcan & Proskuryakova, Liliana N., 2024. "The contribution of energy policies to green energy transition in the Asia-Pacific region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PC).
    6. YuSheng Kong & Rabnawaz Khan, 2019. "To examine environmental pollution by economic growth and their impact in an environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) among developed and developing countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Moataz Elshimy & Khadiga M. El-Aasar, 2020. "Carbon footprint, renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and livestock: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for the Arab world," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6985-7012, October.
    8. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    9. Rossanto Dwi Haryanto & Yessi Rahmawati & Omar Guillermo Rojas Altamirano & Salsabila Fahar Ahsani & Adrianus Kabubu Hudang & Tri Haryanto, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation between FDI, Tourism, and Trade on CO2 Emission in Asia: Testing Environmental Kuznet Curve and Pollution Haven Hypothesis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 385-393, July.
    10. Mwahib Mohammed & Sufian Abdel-Gadir, 2023. "Unveiling the Environmental–Economic Nexus: Cointegration and Causality Analysis of Air Pollution and Growth in Oman," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-18, December.
    11. David I. Stern, 2017. "The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 7-28, April.
    12. Ahmed Samour & Omar Ikbal Tawfik & Magdalena Radulescu & Cristina Florentina Baldan, 2023. "Do Oil Price, Renewable Energy, and Financial Development Matter for Environmental Quality in Oman? Novel Insights from Augmented ARDL Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Abdullah Al Abri & Abdullah Al Kaaf & Musaab Allouyahi & Ali Al Wahaibi & Razzaqul Ahshan & Rashid S. Al Abri & Ahmed Al Abri, 2022. "Techno-Economic and Environmental Analysis of Renewable Mix Hybrid Energy System for Sustainable Electrification of Al-Dhafrat Rural Area in Oman," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Khalid Khan & Chi-Wei Su & Ran Tao & Lin-Na Hao, 2020. "Urbanization and carbon emission: causality evidence from the new industrialized economies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7193-7213, December.
    15. Esmaeil Ebadi & Yousef Abdul Razaq, 2024. "Reinvestigating the Oil Dependency of the GCC Countries’ Stock Market: A Regime-Switching Cointegration Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 387-406, May.
    16. Fikru, Mahelet G. & Kilinc-Ata, Nurcan & Belaïd, Fateh, 2024. "Climate policy stringency and trade in energy transition minerals: An analysis of response patterns," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 431-455, August.
    18. Liton Chandra Voumik & Shohel Md. Nafi & Festus Victor Bekun & Murat Ismet Haseki, 2023. "Modeling Energy, Education, Trade, and Tourism-Induced Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypothesis: Evidence from the Middle East," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Juan Fernández, Aránzazu & Poncela, Pilar & Rodríguez Caballero, Carlos Vladimir, 2022. "Economic activity and climate change," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 35044, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    2. Zhang, Qianxue & Liao, Hua & Hao, Yu, 2018. "Does one path fit all? An empirical study on the relationship between energy consumption and economic development for individual Chinese provinces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 527-543.
    3. Muhammad Shahbaz & Vassilios G. Papavassiliou & Amine Lahiani & David Roubaud, 2023. "Are we moving towards decarbonisation of the global economy? Lessons from the distant past to the present," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2620-2634, July.
    4. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    5. Jikun Jiang & Shenglai Zhu & Weihao Wang, 2022. "Carbon Emissions, Economic Growth, Urbanization, and Foreign Trade in China: Empirical Evidence from ARDL Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Thomas Habanabakize & Lerato Mothibi, 2024. "The Implication of Political Risk and Specific Macroeconomic Variables on Total Revenue in Tourism Industry," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 170-177, May.
    7. C. Seri & A. de Juan Fernandez, 2021. "The relationship between economic growth and environment. Testing the EKC hypothesis for Latin American countries," Papers 2105.11405, arXiv.org.
    8. Kanjilal, Kakali & Ghosh, Sajal, 2013. "Environmental Kuznet’s curve for India: Evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structuralbreaks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 509-515.
    9. Ghosh, Sajal, 2010. "Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: A multivariate cointegration approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 3008-3014, June.
    10. Yugang He, 2022. "Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption and Trade Policy: Do They Matter for Environmental Sustainability?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Jayanthakumaran, Kankesu & Verma, Reetu & Liu, Ying, 2012. "CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: A comparative analysis of China and India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 450-460.
    12. Qiang Wang & Yuanfan Li & Rongrong Li, 2024. "Rethinking the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across 214 countries: the impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Maranzano, Paolo & Cerdeira Bento, Joao Paulo & Manera, Matteo, 2021. "The Role of Education and Income Inequality on Environmental Quality. A Panel Data Analysis of the EKC Hypothesis on OECD," FEEM Working Papers 310225, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    14. Esteve, Vicente & Tamarit, Cecilio, 2012. "Threshold cointegration and nonlinear adjustment between CO2 and income: The Environmental Kuznets Curve in Spain, 1857–2007," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 2148-2156.
    15. Halicioglu, Ferda & Ketenci, Natalya, 2015. "The impact of international trade on environmental quality in transition countries: evidence from time series data during 1991-2013," MPRA Paper 71097, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    16. Janusz Myszczyszyn & Błażej Suproń, 2022. "Relationship among Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, CO 2 Emission, and Urbanization: An Econometric Perspective Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Ozturk, Ilhan & Acaravci, Ali, 2010. "CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3220-3225, December.
    18. Syeda Azra Batool & Humara Ahmad & Syed Muhammad Ahmad Hassan Gillani & Hamad Raza & Muhammad Siddique & Nohman Khan & Muhammad Imran Qureshi, 2021. "Investigating the Causal Linkage among Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Urbanization and Environmental Quality in ASEAN-5 Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 319-327.
    19. Azad Haider & Muhammad Iftikhar ul Husnain & Wimal Rankaduwa & Farzana Shaheen, 2021. "Nexus between Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Agricultural Land Use in Agrarian Economy: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Lars Sorge & Anne Neumann, 2019. "The Impact of Population, Affluence, Technology, and Urbanization on CO2 Emissions across Income Groups," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1812, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:839-:d:1588658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.