IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p708-d1583201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Methods for Determining the Oil Content in Medium-Mature Shale—A Case Study from the Fourth Member of the Shahejie Formation in the Dongying Depression

Author

Listed:
  • Min Wang

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute, Shengli Oifield Company, SINOPEC, Dongying 257015, China
    State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Min Wang

    (School of Geosciences and Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Xinbin Zhao

    (School of Geosciences and Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Junliang Li

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute, Shengli Oifield Company, SINOPEC, Dongying 257015, China)

  • Shun Zhang

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute, Shengli Oifield Company, SINOPEC, Dongying 257015, China)

  • Min Tian

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute, Shengli Oifield Company, SINOPEC, Dongying 257015, China
    School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The oil content of shale oil reservoirs is a key parameter for reserve evaluation and “sweet spot” selection. However, discrepancies in the oil contents obtained by different methods have led to considerable disparities in the selection of exploration well locations and development strategies for shale oil. This study focuses on low to moderately mature sealed coring samples from the Dongying Depression in the Bohai Bay Basin. Three methods—NMR, Dean–Stark, and Rock-Eval—were employed to measure the oil content of shale. The results indicate that the oil content obtained by NMR is the highest, followed by the Dean–Stark distillation extraction method, while the pyrolysis method yields the lowest value. The study found that (1) the efficiency of the solvent extraction effect on moderately to low-mature shale is low since the occurrence of numerous closed pores leads to a lower yield when using the Dean–Stark method. (2) The exposure of shale samples to the air, sample crushing, and lag time for temperature increase cause a significant loss of light hydrocarbon components, resulting in the lowest oil content when measured by the Rock-Eval method. The NMR method, with its advantages of a short analysis time and non-destructive nature, appears to be the most advantageous method for shale oil content evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Wang & Min Wang & Xinbin Zhao & Junliang Li & Shun Zhang & Min Tian, 2025. "Comparison of Methods for Determining the Oil Content in Medium-Mature Shale—A Case Study from the Fourth Member of the Shahejie Formation in the Dongying Depression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:708-:d:1583201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/708/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/708/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:708-:d:1583201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.