IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p648-d1580665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical Security Threat Assessment and Resource Investment Allocation for Electric Power Substations

Author

Listed:
  • Nawaraj Kumar Mahato

    (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Energy Electric Power Information Security, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Jiaxuan Yang

    (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Energy Electric Power Information Security, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Junfeng Yang

    (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Energy Electric Power Information Security, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    School of Computer, Heze University, Heze 274015, China)

  • Ren Qiang

    (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Energy Electric Power Information Security, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Gangjun Gong

    (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Energy Electric Power Information Security, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Jianhong Hao

    (School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

Ensuring the physical security of electric power substations is crucial for maintaining a reliable supply of electricity. The increasing prevalence of physical threats, such as physical attacks, vandalism, sabotage, etc., on electric power substations worldwide has resulted in widespread power outages. To enhance physical security in light of these high-impact, low-probability events, this paper proposes a physical security threat assessment approach to evaluate and enhance substation security against physical attacks utilizing the Substation Criticality Index (SCI) and the Threat–Vulnerability–Consequences Index (TVCI) on risk-based security-constrained economic dispatch. The primary objective is to provide power utilities with actionable insights to proactively strengthen their defenses within budgetary constraints by considering the criticality level of each substation. By incorporating social, economic, and electrical factors, this study simulated a physical attack (specifically a bus-isolating attack), on an IEEE 39-bus test system, and evaluated the resultant consequences and load loss. Upon computation of the SCI, substations are ordered according to their criticality, and computing the TVCI gives the risk of each substation which is used to obtain an optimized physical security investment based on substation vulnerability and the consequences of attacks. Thus, based on these results, decisions for prioritizing substation physical security and investments for hardening physical security are made. Furthermore, the experimentation showed that with the physical security investment, the overall TVCI score has significantly decreased with certain budgetary constant.

Suggested Citation

  • Nawaraj Kumar Mahato & Jiaxuan Yang & Junfeng Yang & Ren Qiang & Gangjun Gong & Jianhong Hao, 2025. "Physical Security Threat Assessment and Resource Investment Allocation for Electric Power Substations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:648-:d:1580665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:648-:d:1580665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.