IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p600-d1578466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Footprint Analysis of Distribution Network Transformers Based on Life Cycle Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Yanpeng Wang

    (State Grid Xinjiang Electric Power Co., Ltd., Economic and Technical Research Institute, Urumqi 830018, China)

  • Haiyang Zhang

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Erbiao Zhou

    (State Grid Xinjiang Electric Power Co., Ltd., Economic and Technical Research Institute, Urumqi 830018, China)

  • Lirong Xie

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Juan Li

    (State Grid Xinjiang Electric Power Co., Ltd., Economic and Technical Research Institute, Urumqi 830018, China)

Abstract

Transformers in the distribution network must have their carbon emissions analyzed in order to meet the “double carbon” goal. Using an oil-immersed distribution transformer as the research object, this paper develops a “cradle-to-grave” carbon accounting model. A life cycle assessment (LCA)-based methodology is proposed to account for carbon emissions and total energy demand over the full life cycle and further analyze the carbon emissions within each stage. A case study is presented using data from a 200 kVA transformer manufactured by a transformer plant in Xinjiang. According to the data, there are 112.18 t of carbon emissions and 798.21 GJ of total energy consumed. Distribution network transformers have carbon emissions of 282 kg, 782 kg, 122.96 kg, 11,079.64 kg, and −88.6 kg throughout the manufacture and manufacturing stage, transportation stage, construction and installation stage, operation stage, and waste recycling stage, respectively. There are 4.12 GJ, 9.06 GJ, 1.34 GJ, 785.97 GJ, and −0.28 GJ in total energy requirements. According to the study, which covered 99.03% of the entire life cycle, the operation stage had the largest percentage of carbon emissions. In addition to streamlining the production process and using more energy-efficient equipment, the waste recovery stage successfully decreased the environmental impact of carbon emissions. Sensitivity analysis shows that the silicon steel sheet and transformer oil has a significant impact on the carbon emissions of distribution network transformers during the life cycle, and the higher the grade of silicon steel sheet, the lower the carbon emissions, and the synthetic ester transformer oil has the most comprehensive performance and the lowest carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanpeng Wang & Haiyang Zhang & Erbiao Zhou & Lirong Xie & Juan Li, 2025. "Carbon Footprint Analysis of Distribution Network Transformers Based on Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:600-:d:1578466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/600/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/600/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martínez, E. & Jiménez, E. & Blanco, J. & Sanz, F., 2010. "LCA sensitivity analysis of a multi-megawatt wind turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2293-2303, July.
    2. Liu, Quanlong & Qiu, Zunxiang & Li, Ma & Shang, Jianping & Niu, Weichao, 2023. "Evaluation and empirical research on green mine construction in coal industry based on the AHP-SPA model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Tremeac, Brice & Meunier, Francis, 2009. "Life cycle analysis of 4.5Â MW and 250Â W wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 2104-2110, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Savino, Matteo M. & Manzini, Riccardo & Della Selva, Vincenzo & Accorsi, Riccardo, 2017. "A new model for environmental and economic evaluation of renewable energy systems: The case of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 739-752.
    2. Kaldellis, John K. & Zafirakis, D., 2011. "The wind energy (r)evolution: A short review of a long history," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1887-1901.
    3. Wang, Shifeng & Wang, Sicong, 2015. "Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 437-443.
    4. Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin, 2016. "Emergy-based sustainability evaluation of wind power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 239-246.
    5. Wang, Like & Wang, Yuan & Du, Huibin & Zuo, Jian & Yi Man Li, Rita & Zhou, Zhihua & Bi, Fenfen & Garvlehn, McSimon P., 2019. "A comparative life-cycle assessment of hydro-, nuclear and wind power: A China study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 37-45.
    6. Dufo-López, Rodolfo & Bernal-Agustín, José L. & Yusta-Loyo, José M. & Domínguez-Navarro, José A. & Ramírez-Rosado, Ignacio J. & Lujano, Juan & Aso, Ismael, 2011. "Multi-objective optimization minimizing cost and life cycle emissions of stand-alone PV–wind–diesel systems with batteries storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4033-4041.
    7. Nagashima, Shin & Uchiyama, Yohji & Okajima, Keiichi, 2017. "Hybrid input–output table method for socioeconomic and environmental assessment of a wind power generation system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1067-1075.
    8. Arvesen, Anders & Hertwich, Edgar G., 2012. "Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: A review of present knowledge and research needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5994-6006.
    9. Mendecka, Barbara & Lombardi, Lidia, 2019. "Life cycle environmental impacts of wind energy technologies: A review of simplified models and harmonization of the results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 462-480.
    10. Nugent, Daniel & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2014. "Assessing the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from solar PV and wind energy: A critical meta-survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 229-244.
    11. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    12. Rashedi, A. & Sridhar, I. & Tseng, K.J., 2013. "Life cycle assessment of 50MW wind firms and strategies for impact reduction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 89-101.
    13. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "A Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 8145, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Niklas Andersen & Ola Eriksson & Karl Hillman & Marita Wallhagen, 2016. "Wind Turbines’ End-of-Life: Quantification and Characterisation of Future Waste Materials on a National Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, November.
    15. Zhao, Xiaoli & Cai, Qiong & Zhang, Sufang & Luo, Kaiyan, 2017. "The substitution of wind power for coal-fired power to realize China's CO2 emissions reduction targets in 2020 and 2030," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 164-178.
    16. Kabir, Md Ruhul & Rooke, Braden & Dassanayake, G.D. Malinga & Fleck, Brian A., 2012. "Comparative life cycle energy, emission, and economic analysis of 100 kW nameplate wind power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 133-141.
    17. Pinto, Edwin S. & Serra, Luis M. & Lázaro, Ana, 2020. "Evaluation of methods to select representative days for the optimization of polygeneration systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 488-502.
    18. Gao, Chengkang & Zhu, Sulong & An, Nan & Na, Hongming & You, Huan & Gao, Chengbo, 2021. "Comprehensive comparison of multiple renewable power generation methods: A combination analysis of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    19. Tabassum-Abbasi, & Premalatha, M. & Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, S.A., 2014. "Wind energy: Increasing deployment, rising environmental concerns," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 270-288.
    20. Hong, Taehoon & Koo, Choongwan & Kwak, Taehyun, 2013. "Framework for the implementation of a new renewable energy system in an educational facility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 539-551.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:600-:d:1578466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.