IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p596-d1578367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis on the Characteristics of Liquid Lead and Lead–Bismuth Eutectic as Coolants for Fast Reactors

Author

Listed:
  • Mian Xing

    (School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    State Power Investment Corporation Research Institute, Beijing 102209, China)

  • Jihong Fan

    (Institute of Energy Power Innovation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Feng Shen

    (State Power Investment Corporation Research Institute, Beijing 102209, China)

  • Daogang Lu

    (School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Linsen Li

    (State Power Investment Corporation Research Institute, Beijing 102209, China)

  • Hui Yu

    (State Power Investment Corporation Research Institute, Beijing 102209, China)

  • Jin Fan

    (State Power Investment Corporation Research Institute, Beijing 102209, China)

Abstract

With the increasing global demand for sustainable energy, the importance of advanced nuclear technologies, such as fourth-generation reactors, has become increasingly prominent. Fourth-generation reactors often use non-water coolants, among which liquid lead and lead–bismuth eutectics (LBEs) are highly promising, making lead-cooled fast reactors (LFRs) a popular area of research internationally. On the basis of extensive analysis and comparison conducted previously, this article summarizes and analyzes the advantages, problems, and differences in lead and LBE as LFR coolants. Overall, both lead and LBE have excellent neutronic characteristics, good heat transfer performance, and chemical inertness, and make LFRs highly efficient in nuclear fuel utilization, inherently safe, and relatively simplified in design. However, both of them corrode materials severely and produce highly toxic 210 Po, which are the problems that need to be considered for further engineering development. Moreover, LBE has a lower melting point, which allows a wider temperature range and lower insulation requirements in its design, making it easier to achieve engineering and miniaturization under the same conditions. Lead has a lower cost, is less corrosive to materials, and produces less 210 Po, which makes it a more ideal coolant for future development.

Suggested Citation

  • Mian Xing & Jihong Fan & Feng Shen & Daogang Lu & Linsen Li & Hui Yu & Jin Fan, 2025. "Comparative Analysis on the Characteristics of Liquid Lead and Lead–Bismuth Eutectic as Coolants for Fast Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:596-:d:1578367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/596/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/596/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:596-:d:1578367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.