IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i3p742-d1333249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of the Combination Mechanism of Spontaneous Imbibition and Water Flooding in Tight Oil Reservoirs Based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Tao

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
    Engineering Research Center of Development and Management for Low to Ultra-Low Permeability Oil & Gas Reservoirs in West China, Ministry of Education, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China)

  • Longlong Wang

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Jiajia Bai

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Na Zhang

    (College of Petrochemical Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Wenyang Shi

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Qingjie Zhu

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Zhengxiao Xu

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Guoqing Wang

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

Abstract

As conventional oil reservoirs are gradually being depleted, researchers worldwide are progressively shifting their focus towards the development and comprehensive study of tight oil reservoirs. Considering that hydraulic fracturing is one of the main approaches for developing tight sandstone reservoirs, it is of great significance to explore the mechanism of spontaneous imbibition and waterflooding behavior after hydraulic fracturing in tight oil reservoirs. This research delves into the analysis of tight sandstone core samples obtained from the Shahejie Formation in the Bohai Bay Basin. All core samples are used for a series of experiments, including spontaneous imbibition and water flooding experiments. An additional well-shut period experiment is designed to understand the impact and operational dynamics of well shut-in procedures in tight reservoir development. Utilizing nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology, the pore sizes of a sample are divided into three types, namely, macropores (>100 ms), mesopores (10–100 ms), and micropores (<10 ms), to thoroughly assess the fluid distribution and changes in fluid signals during the spontaneous imbibition and water flooding stages. Experimental outcomes reveal that during the spontaneous imbibition stage, oil recovery ranges from 12.23% to 18.70%, predominantly depending on capillary forces. The final oil recovery initially rises and then falls as permeability decreases, while the contribution of micropores progressively grows as the share of mesopores and macropores deceases. With water flooding processes carried out after spontaneous imbibition, enhanced oil recovery is observed between 28.26% and 33.50% and is directly proportional to permeability. The well shut-in procedures can elevate the oil recovery to as high as 47.66% by optimizing energy balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Tao & Longlong Wang & Jiajia Bai & Na Zhang & Wenyang Shi & Qingjie Zhu & Zhengxiao Xu & Guoqing Wang, 2024. "Investigation of the Combination Mechanism of Spontaneous Imbibition and Water Flooding in Tight Oil Reservoirs Based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:742-:d:1333249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/742/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/742/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wheeler, David & MacGregor, Margo & Atherton, Frank & Christmas, Kevin & Dalton, Shawn & Dusseault, Maurice & Gagnon, Graham & Hayes, Brad & MacIntosh, Constance & Mauro, Ian & Ritcey, Ray, 2015. "Hydraulic fracturing – Integrating public participation with an independent review of the risks and benefits," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 299-308.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clarke, Christopher E. & Evensen, Darrick T.N., 2023. "Attention to news media coverage of unconventional oil/gas development impacts: Exploring psychological antecedents and effects on issue support," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Lai, Po-Hsin & Lyons, Kevin D. & Gudergan, Siegfried P. & Grimstad, Sidsel, 2017. "Understanding the psychological impact of unconventional gas developments in affected communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 492-501.
    3. Martínez-Espiñeira, Roberto & García-Valiñas, María Á. & Matesanz, David, 2019. "Public Attitudes towards Hydraulic Fracturing in Western Newfoundland," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Heather Millar, 2020. "Problem Uncertainty, Institutional Insularity, and Modes of Learning in Canadian Provincial Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(6), pages 765-796, November.
    5. Brisbois, Ben & Hoogeveen, Dawn & Allison, Sandra & Cole, Donald & Fyfe, Trina M. & Harder, Henry G. & Parkes, Margot W., 2021. "Storylines of research on resource extraction and health in Canada: A modified metanarrative synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    6. Lee, Michelle H.W. & Clark, Ashley & Rupp, John & Wietelman, Derek C. & Graham, John D., 2019. "Public opinion toward hydraulic fracturing: The effect of beyond compliance and voluntary third-party certification," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 306-315.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:742-:d:1333249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.