IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i2p511-d1323029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Optimal PV Allocation in a Distribution Network Using Evolutionary Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Wenlei Bai

    (School of Engineering and Computer Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA)

  • Wen Zhang

    (Hankamer School of Business, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA)

  • Richard Allmendinger

    (Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester M15 6PB, UK)

  • Innocent Enyekwe

    (School of Engineering and Computer Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA)

  • Kwang Y. Lee

    (School of Engineering and Computer Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA)

Abstract

The growing distributed energy resource (DER) penetration into distribution networks, such as through residential and commercial photovoltaics (PV), has emerged through a transition from passive to active networks, which takes the complexity of planning and operations to the next level. Optimal PV allocation (sizing and location) is challenging because it involves mixed-integer non-linear programming with three-phase non-linear unbalanced power flow equations. Meta-heuristic algorithms have proven their effectiveness in many complex engineering problems. Thus, in this study, we propose to achieve optimal PV allocation by using several basic evolutionary algorithms (EAs), particle swarm optimization (PSO), artificial bee colony (ABC), differential evolution (DE), and their variants, all of which are applied for a study of their performance levels. Two modified unbalanced IEEE test feeders (13 and 37 bus) are developed to evaluate these performance levels, with two objectives: one is to maximize PV penetration, and the other is to minimize the voltage deviation from 1.0 p.u. To handle the computational burden of the sequential power flow and unbalanced network, we adopt an efficient iterative load flow algorithm instead of the commonly used and yet highly simplified forward–backward sweep method. A comparative study of these basic EAs shows their general success in finding a near-optimal solution, except in the case of the DE, which is known for solving continuous optimization problems efficiently. From experiments run 30 times, it is observed that PSO-related algorithms are more efficient and robust in the maximum PV penetration case, while ABC-related algorithms are more efficient and robust in the minimum voltage deviation case.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenlei Bai & Wen Zhang & Richard Allmendinger & Innocent Enyekwe & Kwang Y. Lee, 2024. "A Comparative Study of Optimal PV Allocation in a Distribution Network Using Evolutionary Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:511-:d:1323029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/511/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/511/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wallisson C. Nogueira & Lina P. Garcés Negrete & Jesús M. López-Lezama, 2023. "Optimal Allocation and Sizing of Distributed Generation Using Interval Power Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmoud A. Elsadd & Ahmed F. Zobaa & Heba A. Khattab & Ahmed M. Abd El Aziz & Tamer Fetouh, 2023. "Communicationless Overcurrent Relays Coordination for Active Distribution Network Considering Fault Repairing Periods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-32, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:511-:d:1323029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.