IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i24p6227-d1540821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers

Author

Listed:
  • Enyi Yu

    (Department of Energy and Resources Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Yuan Di

    (Department of Energy and Resources Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

Abstract

Wireline formation fluid sampling is extensively utilized to acquire downhole fluid samples. Due to mud filtrate invasion, enough time is required to pump out the formation fluid so that an acceptable level of contaminant is reached. Excessive cleanup time would increase costs and the risk of the testing tool becoming stuck within the drilling mud. The challenge lies in deciding what type of formation-tester probe should be used to ensure minimally contaminated measurements for a specific tool configuration and when the withdrawal sample is sufficiently purged of contaminants. A numerical simulator to simulate the virgin formation fluid sampling was developed, and the accuracy of the simulator was validated based on the spherical flow theory. Through running 2515 simulation cases, the effects of various operational and formation conditions on the breakthrough and pumpout times with three different probes (i.e., the standard probe, the elliptical probe, the elongated probe, and their corresponding 3D radial probes) were compared and analyzed quantitatively. We numerically investigated the key factors influencing the breakthrough and pumpout times and delved into the impact of the formation anisotropy. This study reveals the parameters that encompass the first-order effect on the breakthrough and pumpout times, enabling the determination of the probe-type selection and the early predictions of pumpout time. By leveraging these insights, sampling operations can be optimized to enhance sample quality, reduce operational time, and mitigate the risks associated with tool entrapment.

Suggested Citation

  • Enyi Yu & Yuan Di, 2024. "Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6227-:d:1540821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6227/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6227/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6227-:d:1540821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.