Author
Listed:
- Anqi Qu
(Center for Hydrate Research, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, 1600 Illinois Street, Golden, CO 80401, USA)
- Luiz F. R. Dalla
(Department of Petroleum Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, 1600 Arapahoe Street, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Petrobras, Vitória 29057-550, ES, Brazil)
- Luis E. Zerpa
(Department of Petroleum Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, 1600 Arapahoe Street, Golden, CO 80401, USA)
- Thierry Palermo
(TotalEnergies R&D Deep Offshore-FA Theme, 64018 Pau, France)
- Khalid Mateen
(TotalEnergies E&P Research and Technology USA LLC, Houston, TX 77002, USA)
- Annie Fidel-Dufour
(TotalEnergies R&D Deep Offshore-FA Theme, 64018 Pau, France)
- Carolyn A. Koh
(Center for Hydrate Research, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, 1600 Illinois Street, Golden, CO 80401, USA)
Abstract
Gas hydrate formation in pipelines transporting multiphase fluids from petroleum reservoirs can lead to the formation of blockages, representing a significant flow assurance challenge. Key issues caused by hydrates include substantial increases in the viscosity of mixed liquid phases and the deposition of hydrates on the pipeline wall. This study compares two existing transient multiphase flow simulators, OLGA and LedaFlow, in terms of their estimation of hydrate formation effects on multiphase flow. Here, we compared in detail the hydrate kinetic models, parameters used, and initial condition setup approaches that influence hydrate formation and affect multiphase flow properties. Based on the comparison between the simulation results, it was found that using both simulators with default setups may not lead to comparable results under certain conditions. Adjusting input parameters, such as the stoichiometric coefficient and hydrate formation enthalpy, is necessary in order to obtain equivalent results. Hydrate modules in both simulators have also been applied to a field case. With appropriate setup, OLGA and LedaFlow produce comparable results during steady-state simulations, which align with field observations. This work provides guidelines for setting up OLGA and LedaFlow simulation models to obtain equivalent results.
Suggested Citation
Anqi Qu & Luiz F. R. Dalla & Luis E. Zerpa & Thierry Palermo & Khalid Mateen & Annie Fidel-Dufour & Carolyn A. Koh, 2024.
"Comparative Study of OLGA and LedaFlow Models for Mechanistic Predictions of Hydrate Transport Dynamics,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-17, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6101-:d:1536295
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6101-:d:1536295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.