IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i22p5693-d1520891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knock Detection with Ion Current and Vibration Sensor: A Comparative Study of Logistic Regression and Neural Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Ola Björnsson

    (Department of Energy Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 221 00 Lund, Sweden)

  • Per Tunestål

    (Department of Energy Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 221 00 Lund, Sweden)

Abstract

Knock detection is critical for maintaining engine performance and preventing damage in spark-ignition engines. This study explores the use of ion current and knock indicators derived from a vibration sensor ( K I v ) and ion current ( K I i ) to improve knock detection accuracy. Traditional threshold-based methods rely on K I v , but they are susceptible to mechanical noise and cylinder variations. In this work, we applied both logistic regression and neural networks, including fully connected (FCNN) and convolutional neural networks (CNN), to classify knock events based on these indicators. The CNN models used ion current as the primary input, with an extended version incorporating both K I v and K I i into the fully connected layers. The models were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) as the primary performance metric. The results show that the CNN model with additional inputs outperformed the other models, achieving a better and more consistent performance across cylinders. The dual-input logistic regression and CNN models demonstrated reduced cylinder-to-cylinder variation in classification performance, providing a more consistent knock detection accuracy across all cylinders. These findings suggest that combining ion current and knock indicators enhances knock detection reliability, offering a robust solution for real-time applications in engine control systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ola Björnsson & Per Tunestål, 2024. "Knock Detection with Ion Current and Vibration Sensor: A Comparative Study of Logistic Regression and Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:22:p:5693-:d:1520891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/22/5693/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/22/5693/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:22:p:5693-:d:1520891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.