Author
Listed:
- Tania Demonte Gonzalez
(Mechanical Engineering–Engineering Mechanics Department, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Enrico Anderlini
(Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1N 1AX, UK
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Houssein Yassin
(Mechanical Engineering–Engineering Mechanics Department, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Gordon Parker
(Mechanical Engineering–Engineering Mechanics Department, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
Abstract
Wave energy holds significant promise as a renewable energy source due to the consistent and predictable nature of ocean waves. However, optimizing wave energy devices is essential for achieving competitive viability in the energy market. This paper presents the application of a nonlinear model predictive controller (MPC) to enhance the energy extraction of a heaving point absorber. The wave energy converter (WEC) model accounts for the nonlinear dynamics and static Froude–Krylov forces, which are essential in accurately representing the system’s behavior. The nonlinear MPC is tested under irregular wave conditions within the power production region, where constraints on displacement and the power take-off (PTO) force are enforced to ensure the WEC’s safety while maximizing energy absorption. A comparison is made with a linear MPC, which uses a linear approximation of the Froude–Krylov forces. The study comprehensively compares power performance and computational costs between the linear and nonlinear MPC approaches. Both MPC variants determine the optimal PTO force to maximize energy absorption, utilizing (1) a linear WEC model (LMPC) for state predictions and (2) a nonlinear model (NLMPC) incorporating exact Froude–Krylov forces. Additionally, the study analyzes four controller configurations, varying the MPC prediction horizon and re-optimization time. The results indicate that, in general, the NLMPC achieves higher energy absorption than the LMPC. The nonlinear model also better adheres to system constraints, with the linear model showing some displacement violations. This paper further discusses the computational load and power generation implications of adjusting the prediction horizon and re-optimization time parameters in the NLMPC.
Suggested Citation
Tania Demonte Gonzalez & Enrico Anderlini & Houssein Yassin & Gordon Parker, 2024.
"Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Heaving Wave Energy Converter with Nonlinear Froude–Krylov Forces,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-16, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5112-:d:1498782
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5112-:d:1498782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.