Author
Listed:
- Ionut Lambrescu
(Informatics, Information Technology, Mathematics and Physics, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, 100680 Ploiești, Romania)
- Khizar Abid
(Mewbourne Petroleum and Geological School, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)
- Catalin Teodoriu
(Mewbourne Petroleum and Geological School, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA)
Abstract
Geothermal wells are subjected to higher loads compared to conventional oil and gas wells due to the thermal cycles that occur during both production and non-production phases. These temperature variations can affect the cohesion of the cement within the formation and casing, creating micro-annuli channels that can ultimately compromise the integrity of the well. Therefore, this study employs an intensive finite element methodology to analyze the debonding criteria of casing–cement systems in geothermal wells by examining over 36 independent models. The wellbore cooling and heating processes were simulated using three cohesive zone models (CZM): Type I (tensile), Type II (shear), and mixed (Type I and II simultaneously). The analysis revealed that Type I debonding occurs first during cooling at a temperature of around 10 °C, while Type II is the primary failure mode during heating. Evaluations of interfacial bonding shear strength (IBSS) values indicated that the debonding of the cement would even occur at high IBSS values (3 and 4 MPa) at a differential temperature of 300 °C, while the other IBSS of 1 MPa withstands only 60 °C. However, achieving an IBSS of 4 MPa with current technology is highly unlikely. Therefore, geothermal well operation and construction must be modified to keep the differential temperature below the critical temperature at which the debonding of the cement initiates. The study also found that debonding during cooling happens at lower differential temperatures due to generally lower values for interfacial bonding tensile strength (IBTS), typically less than 1 MPa. The novelty of the study is that it provides new insights into how specific temperatures trigger different types of debonding, highlights that high IBSS values may not prevent debonding at high differential temperatures, and recommends operational adjustments to maintain temperatures below critical levels to enhance cement integrity. Additionally, this study reveals that debonding during cooling occurs at a lower differential temperature change due to the reduced value of the interfacial bonding tensile strength (IBTS).
Suggested Citation
Ionut Lambrescu & Khizar Abid & Catalin Teodoriu, 2024.
"Cement-Formation Debonding Due to Temperature Variation in Geothermal Wells: An Intensive Numerical Simulation Assessment,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4953-:d:1491751
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4953-:d:1491751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.