Author
Listed:
- Filipe Monteiro
(Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)
- Eduardo Sarquis
(IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)
- Paulo Branco
(IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)
Abstract
Recent advancements in power electronics have significantly improved photovoltaic (PV) inverters by equipping them with sophisticated monitoring capabilities. These enhancements provide economic advantages by facilitating swift failure detection and lowering monitoring costs. Educating users on the economic repercussions of undetected failures in specific inverter monitoring systems is crucial. This paper introduces a novel metric, “Cost of Detection”, which assesses the financial impact of failures, considering the repair expenses and the “quality” of the monitoring system in place. The study analyzed fifteen inverter monitoring solutions, focusing on the variance in alerts generated by the manufacturers’ standard and extra monitoring features. Employing the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method, alerts were prioritized based on their importance for two PV system scenarios: a low-power residential system (5 kWp) and a medium-power industrial/commercial system (100 kWp). Lisbon, Rome, and Berlin were chosen as the locations for these systems. The economic impact of system failures is evaluated annually for each capacity and city. Given the differing costs and annual yields, comparing their economic performance over time is essential. This comparison utilizes the Net Present Value (NPV), which estimates an investment’s worth by calculating the present value of all cash flows. The investment assessment includes only the costs of inverters and optimizers, excluding O&M expenses, licenses, and fees. Over five years, a higher NPV signifies a more economically advantageous solution. For residential systems, string inverters with optimizers have the highest NPV, surpassing those without optimizers by 17% across all three cities. The optimal monitoring solution in the industrial/commercial context was a string inverter with one optimizer for every two panels. Here, Rome emerged as the location with the most substantial NPV increase of 50%, followed by Berlin with 33% and Lisbon with 28%.
Suggested Citation
Filipe Monteiro & Eduardo Sarquis & Paulo Branco, 2024.
"Identifying Critical Failures in PV Systems Based on PV Inverters’ Monitoring Unit: A Techno-Economic Analysis,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4738-:d:1483586
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4738-:d:1483586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.