IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i18p4567-d1476545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SO 2 Emissions from Oil Shale Oxyfuel Combustion in a 60 kWth Circulating Fluidized Bed

Author

Listed:
  • Mais Baqain

    (Department of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Dmitri Neshumayev

    (Department of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Alar Konist

    (Department of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

Abstract

Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) have emerged as pivotal technologies for curtailing emissions while maintaining fossil fuel. Estonia faces a challenge due to its dependence on carbon-intensive oil shale, but the need for energy security, highlighted by the war in Ukraine, makes reducing CO 2 emissions a priority while maintaining energy independence. In this context, the presented study determines the environmental impact of combustion of the Estonian oil shale from the release of SO 2 emission and compares sulfur retention in the ash between different oxyfuel combustion campaigns in a 60 kWth CFB test facility. The pilot was operated under air, O 2 /CO 2 , and with recycled flue gas (RFG), and we tested the application of extremely high inlet O 2 up to 87% vol . The key objective of this study is to examine how different combustion atmospheres, operating temperatures, and excess oxygen ratios influence SO 2 formation. Additionally, the research focuses on analyzing anhydrite (CaSO 4 ), calcite (CaCO 3 ), and lime (CaO) in ash samples collected from the dense bed region (bottom ash) and the external heat exchanger (circulating ash). The results indicate that increased inlet O 2 % does not significantly affect SO 2 emissions. Compared to air-firing, SO 2 emissions were higher than 40 mg/MJ under a 21/79% vol O 2 /CO 2 environment but were significantly reduced, approaching zero, as the inlet O 2 % increased to 50%. Under O 2 /RFG conditions, higher SO 2 concentrations led to increased sulfur retention in both the bottom and circulating ash. The optimal temperature for sulfur retention in air and oxyfuel combustions is below 850 °C. This study for the first time provides a technical model and discusses the effects of operating parameters on sulfur emissions of the Estonian oil shale CFB oxyfuel combustion.

Suggested Citation

  • Mais Baqain & Dmitri Neshumayev & Alar Konist, 2024. "SO 2 Emissions from Oil Shale Oxyfuel Combustion in a 60 kWth Circulating Fluidized Bed," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4567-:d:1476545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/18/4567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/18/4567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4567-:d:1476545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.