Author
Listed:
- Hong Tuo
(Experimental Testing Research Institute, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, CNPC, Karamay 834000, China)
- Baoxing Liang
(Experimental Testing Research Institute, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, CNPC, Karamay 834000, China)
- Qixiang Wang
(Experimental Testing Research Institute, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, CNPC, Karamay 834000, China)
- Jianghua Yue
(Experimental Testing Research Institute, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, CNPC, Karamay 834000, China)
- Long Tan
(Experimental Testing Research Institute, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, CNPC, Karamay 834000, China)
- Yilong Li
(State Key Laboratory of Oil-Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)
- Hao Yang
(State Key Laboratory of Oil-Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)
- Zhan Meng
(State Key Laboratory of Oil-Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)
Abstract
Addressing the issue of poor water injection development effectiveness caused by strong water sensitivity damage in the conglomerate reservoirs of the Xinjiang Oilfield, this paper carries out experimental research on CO 2 displacement and CO 2 huff-n-puff to improve oil recovery in reservoirs under the conditions of reservoirs (86 °C, 44 MPa) by using a high-temperature and high-pressure large physical modeling repulsion device based on the artificial large-scale physical modeling of conglomerate oil reservoirs in the Xinjiang oilfield. The results showed that at any displacement rate, CO 2 displacement exhibits the trend where oil production initially increases and then decreases. The higher the gas injection rate, the higher the initial oil well production, and the shorter the time it takes for CO 2 to break through to the bottom of the well. After a breakthrough, production declines more rapidly. The oil recovery rate varies with different gas injection rates, initially increasing and then decreasing as the injection rate changes. The highest oil recovery rate was observed at an injection rate of 1.5 mL/min (equivalent to 38 t/d in the field). The efficiency of CO 2 displacement with multiple injection-production cycles is low; on the same scale of gas injection, single-cycle injection and production were more effective than multiple-cycle injection and production. CO 2 huff-n-puff can improve oil recovery, with a higher CO 2 injection pressure and a longer shut-in time leading to greater oil recovery. As the shut-in time increases, the efficiency of CO 2 oil exchange also improves. The strong supply capacity of the large physical model results in a tendency for the oil production curves of multiple huff-n-puff cycles to converge.
Suggested Citation
Hong Tuo & Baoxing Liang & Qixiang Wang & Jianghua Yue & Long Tan & Yilong Li & Hao Yang & Zhan Meng, 2024.
"Experimental Study on the Optimization of CO 2 Displacement and Huff-n-Puff Parameters in the Conglomerate Reservoirs of the Xinjiang Oilfield,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-13, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4437-:d:1471315
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4437-:d:1471315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.