IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i17p4372-d1469042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Gravimetric Determination of Methane Sorption Capacities of Coals for Using Their Results in Assessing Outbursts in Mines

Author

Listed:
  • Dariusz Obracaj

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Marek Korzec

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Marcin Dreger

    (CLP-B Laboratory, Rybnicka 6, 44-335 Jastrzebie-Zdroj, Poland)

Abstract

The gravimetric method for determining coal gas sorption has many advantages and limitations. The article presents the influence of various factors on the results of methane sorption on coal. In mining practice, in addition to sorption properties of coal, knowledge of methane sorption capacity and effective diffusion coefficient determined when assuming a unipore sorption/desorption model are crucial for predicting sudden releases of methane from coal seams to a mine ventilation environment. In Poland, determining sorption capacities of coals for methane is mandatory when starting mining operations in new parts of coal deposits threatened by outbursts. Traditionally, gravimetric microbalances, such as intelligent gravimetric analysis (IGA), are used to determine adsorption capacity and desorption rate. Recently, newer microbalances XEMIS have been introduced to the market. Two gas laboratories, AGH in Krakow and CLP-B in Jastrzebie-Zdroj, respectively, compared experimental adsorption isotherms using XEMIS microbalances with mutually exchanged coal samples. Both sorption capacity at the pressure of 1 bar ( a 1 b a r ) and effective diffusion coefficient ( D e ) were independently determined for the coal samples tested. The results obtained are comparable despite the use of different microbalance XEMIS models. The conducted studies and comparative evaluation of the results allowed for assessing procedures for determining sorption properties using XEMIS microbalances. The exchange of laboratory experiences also allowed for the identification of methodology factors crucial for the development of a uniform procedure for conducting similar studies with XEMIS microbalance. The proposed factors for testing the sorption behavior of methane in coal structures may be helpful in mining practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariusz Obracaj & Marek Korzec & Marcin Dreger, 2024. "Comparison of Gravimetric Determination of Methane Sorption Capacities of Coals for Using Their Results in Assessing Outbursts in Mines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4372-:d:1469042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4372/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4372/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui. Liu & Shanjun Mao & Mei. Li & Pingyang Lyu, 2020. "A GIS Based Unsteady Network Model and System Applications for Intelligent Mine Ventilation," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-8, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4372-:d:1469042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.