IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i17p4282-d1465222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Model and Life Cycle Assessment of Biorefinery Concept Using Agricultural and Industrial Residues for Biohydrogen Production

Author

Listed:
  • Edgar Gamero

    (Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production EEP, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 35, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Sophia Ruppert

    (Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production EEP, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 35, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Robert Miehe

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Institute of Industrial Manufacturing and Management IFF, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 35, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Alexander Sauer

    (Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production EEP, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 35, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Sustainable waste management strategies are urgently needed due to an increasing global population and increased waste production. In this context, biorefineries have recently emerged as a promising approach to valorize waste streams and supply a broad range of products. This study presents the process model and life cycle assessment (LCA) of a biorefinery concept using a novel biochemical method, a so-called “dark photosynthesis” conversion. This process is coupled to a photo-fermentation using microalgae. Overall, the biorefinery concept can produce hydrogen, lutein, β-carotene, and proteins for animal feed. Apple pomace from apple juice production is used as feedstock for the primary conversion step. A process model was created with the process simulation software Aspen Plus ® using experimental and literature data. Results from this model were then used in an LCA. The environmental impacts of the proposed biorefinery concept are relatively high, showing the need for process optimization in several areas. Energy system integration, stream recycling, and higher hydrogen yields are recognized as especially important for improving the environmental performance of this concept. Despite these findings, the model shows the feasibility of implementing the biochemical conversion technologies in a biorefinery concept for effectively utilizing residue streams.

Suggested Citation

  • Edgar Gamero & Sophia Ruppert & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2024. "Process Model and Life Cycle Assessment of Biorefinery Concept Using Agricultural and Industrial Residues for Biohydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4282-:d:1465222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuijing Wang & Chenming Xu & Liyan Song & Jin Zhang, 2022. "Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Its Microbial Consortia: A Historical Review and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Hosseinzadeh, Ahmad & Zhou, John L. & Li, Xiaowei & Afsari, Morteza & Altaee, Ali, 2022. "Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of hydrogen production processes using bio-waste as renewable energy resource," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Xinxin & Zhao, Junhui & He, Chao & Liu, Liang & Li, Gang & Pan, Xiaohui & Xu, Guizhuan & Lu, Chaoyang & Zhang, Quanguo & Jiao, Youzhou, 2023. "A new approach for evaluating photosynthetic bio-hydrogen production: The dissipation rate method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    2. Li, Xinxin & Tong, Jingjing & Yuan, Maomao & Song, Mei & Gao, Jingsi & Zhu, Jia & Liu, Yanping, 2023. "Demonstrating the application of batch anaerobic digestion recirculating slurry inoculation of food waste engineering from a microbiological perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Ahmed Fathy & Hegazy Rezk & Dalia Yousri & Abdullah G. Alharbi & Sulaiman Alshammari & Yahia B. Hassan, 2023. "Maximizing Bio-Hydrogen Production from an Innovative Microbial Electrolysis Cell Using Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Jesús Rey & Francisca Segura & José Manuel Andújar, 2023. "Green Hydrogen: Resources Consumption, Technological Maturity, and Regulatory Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, August.
    5. Andrés Rengel & Alexander Aguila Téllez & Leony Ortiz & Milton Ruiz, 2023. "Optimal Insertion of Energy Storage Systems Considering the Economic Dispatch and the Minimization of Energy Not Supplied," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Zhuojun He & Cheng Yang & Yan Peng & Taoze Liu & Zhanghong Wang & Chengcai Xiong, 2023. "Effect of Adding De-Oiled Kitchen Water on the Bioconversion of Kitchen Waste Treatment Residue by Black Soldier Fly Larvae," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Busch, P. & Kendall, A. & Lipman, T., 2023. "A systematic review of life cycle greenhouse gas intensity values for hydrogen production pathways," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. José Ramón Copa Rey & Cecilia Mateos-Pedrero & Andrei Longo & Bruna Rijo & Paulo Brito & Paulo Ferreira & Catarina Nobre, 2024. "Renewable Hydrogen from Biomass: Technological Pathways and Economic Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-36, July.
    9. Katarzyna Bernat & Thi Cam Tu Le & Magdalena Zaborowska & Dorota Kulikowska, 2023. "Pre-Treatment of Separately Collected Biowaste as a Way to Increase Methane Production and Digestate Stability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4282-:d:1465222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.