Author
Listed:
- Xinqiang Liu
(College of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an 710018, China
National Elite Institute of Engineering, CNPC, Beijing 100096, China)
- Jinbu Li
(Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an 710018, China)
- Yuming Liu
(College of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)
- Qi Chen
(College of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)
- Yuqi Bai
(Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an 710018, China)
- Fuping Li
(Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an 710018, China)
- Lei Jin
(College of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)
- Bingbing Zhang
(College of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)
Abstract
The H8 and S1 reservoirs in the lower Shihezi Formation and Shanxi Formation of the central block in the Sulige Gas Field are typical fluvial tight sandstone reservoirs. Due to frequent river channel migrations during deposition, the reservoirs exhibit complex spatial structures with developed intra-sand mudstone interlayers. As the field has entered the middle and late stages of development, the distribution of remaining gas is intricately controlled by these interlayers, necessitating research on their distribution to understand the remaining gas patterns and types for effective extraction enhancement. However, the thinness of interlayers presents a challenge for precise prediction. Addressing this, this study delineates different interlayer types and their origins, applies reservoir architecture theory, and utilizes bounding surfaces characterization, planar and sectional distribution studies, unit scale analysis, horizontal well data, and quantitative characterization methods to investigate the internal reservoir architecture bounding surfaces. The study finely portrays the interlayer distribution, analyzes the control of reservoir architecture bounding surfaces on remaining gas, and establishes a multi-tiered reservoir architecture model in the study area. Numerical simulation of the gas reservoir clarifies the types of remaining gas enrichment. This study also identifies and quantitatively characterizes the 5–3 level architecture bounding surfaces within the sandbody, categorizing the remaining gas into bounding surfaces-controlled, well-network uncontrolled, and single-layer unperforated types, proposing targeted enhancement measures for each type. Based on the findings, four vertical wells and three horizontal wells were deployed, improving the well network density to three wells per square kilometer. The first completed horizontal well encountered an effective drilling rate of 61.7%, marking significant implications for the exploitation and recovery enhancement of similar tight sandstone gas reservoirs.
Suggested Citation
Xinqiang Liu & Jinbu Li & Yuming Liu & Qi Chen & Yuqi Bai & Fuping Li & Lei Jin & Bingbing Zhang, 2024.
"Characterization of Architecture Bounding Surfaces in Fluvial Tight Sandstone Reservoirs and Their Influence on Remaining Gas: A Case Study from the Suzhong Block, Sulige Gas Field,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4262-:d:1464360
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4262-:d:1464360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.