Author
Listed:
- Hongwei Shi
(School of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330044, China)
- Xiao Yin
(National Energy Group Nanning Power Generation Co., Ltd., Nanning 530028, China)
- Chunming Wang
(School of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330044, China)
- Haipeng Wang
(School of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330044, China)
Abstract
The use of fully premixed combustion in small gas boilers can improve denitrification efficiency. On the basis of fully premixed combustion, adding flame stabilizers inside the boiler can further reduce production of oxides of nitrogen. Four types of flame-stabilizing baffles were added at a certain position inside the furnace after the fully premixed burner. Experiments were conducted separately on the Noporous baffle, and numerical calculations were performed for 36 operating conditions of the four baffles. The experimental results and numerical calculations indicate that under experimental conditions, NO x emissions were all below 40 mg/m 3 , and the net heat efficiency of the boiler was above 80%. Under a maximum firing rate, CO emissions are below 20 ppm, and the minimum error between the calculated and experimental values is 2.2%. The calculation error of CO emissions under various working conditions does not exceed 6.8%, indicating that the impact of different-shaped baffles on CO emissions is relatively small. When installing a Nonporous baffle, the error between the experimental and calculated exhaust temperature values under minimum firing rates is 6.6%, the error between the calculated and measured values under middle firing conditions is 2.9%, and the error between the calculated and measured values under maximum firing rate conditions is 3.0%. Among the four different partition conditions, the exhaust temperature of the Nonporous baffle is the lowest. Under the same excess air coefficient, the pressure in the furnace for the middle and maximum firing rate is higher than that of the minimum firing rate, and the experimental values are in good agreement with the calculated values. When installing the Strip baffle, the calculated CO 2 emission is the lowest. The experimental results show that the NO x in the flue gas inside the furnace is mainly NO, and the NO content exceeds 75%, reaching a maximum of 85%. The experimental results show that the minimum NO x emission value is 26.9 mg/m 3 . The error between the measured and calculated NO x values when installing a Nonporous baffle is 20.4%. All of the above indicate that installing a flame-stabilizing baffle at an appropriate position in the furnace can further reduce NO x emissions, and the optimization amplitude is related to the shape of the baffle.
Suggested Citation
Hongwei Shi & Xiao Yin & Chunming Wang & Haipeng Wang, 2024.
"Experimental and Numerical Simulation Research on Different Shapes of Flame-Stabilizing Baffles in the Furnace,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-21, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4253-:d:1463992
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4253-:d:1463992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.