IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i16p4090-d1458264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermoecological Cost Analysis of Hydrothermal Carbonization for Valorization of Under-Sieve Fraction from Municipal Solid Wastes

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Mendecka

    (Department of Engineering, Niccolò Cusano University, Via don Carlo Gnocchi 3, 00166 Rome, Italy)

  • Klaudia Czerwińska

    (Department of Heat Engineering and Environment Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Lidia Lombardi

    (Department of Engineering, Niccolò Cusano University, Via don Carlo Gnocchi 3, 00166 Rome, Italy)

  • Maciej Śliz

    (Department of Heat Engineering and Environment Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Wilk

    (Department of Heat Engineering and Environment Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) management poses significant challenges due to the generation of organic waste materials, including the under-sieve fraction (USF), which contains high moisture and organic content. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) has emerged as a promising technology for converting USF into hydrochar (HC), a valuable energy-rich material with improved combustible properties. Despite the potential of HTC for waste valorization, comprehensive studies on the thermoecological cost (TEC) and environmental implications of applying HTC to USF are limited. In this study, a detailed analysis of the TEC associated with the HTC process applied to USF from MSW was conducted. The TEC assessment was conducted considering varying dilution ratios (DS/W), operational temperatures (180–220 °C), and reaction times (1–8 h) to evaluate the energy efficiency, resource utilization, and environmental impact of the HTC process. Comparative assessments were made with alternative USF treatment methods, such as bio-stabilization, landfilling, and wastewater treatment. The results indicate that the optimal conditions for minimizing TEC are a temperature of 180 °C, a reaction time of 1 h, and a dilution ratio of 0.15, achieving a TEC value of approximately 9.25 GJ per ton of USF. This represents a significant reduction compared to the conventional treatment methods, which showed a TEC of 14.9 GJ/ton of USF. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of HTC with alternative USF treatment methods, such as bio-stabilization and landfilling, highlighting HTC’s superior energy efficiency and environmental sustainability. These findings offer valuable insights into the energy consumption, resource utilization, and environmental impact of HTC, emphasizing its potential for sustainable waste valorization.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Mendecka & Klaudia Czerwińska & Lidia Lombardi & Maciej Śliz & Małgorzata Wilk, 2024. "Thermoecological Cost Analysis of Hydrothermal Carbonization for Valorization of Under-Sieve Fraction from Municipal Solid Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:16:p:4090-:d:1458264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/16/4090/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/16/4090/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:16:p:4090-:d:1458264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.