IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i16p3972-d1453877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Innovative Double-Frontier Approach to Measure Sustainability Efficiency Based on an Energy Use and Operations Management Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Linyan Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192, China
    Beijing Key Lab of Green Development Decision Based on Big Data, Beijing 100192, China)

  • Chunhao Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192, China)

  • Jian Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192, China
    Beijing Key Lab of Green Development Decision Based on Big Data, Beijing 100192, China)

  • Bingyin Lei

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192, China)

  • Anke Xie

    (Yunnan Key Laboratory of Blockchain Application Technology, Kunming 650233, China
    Yunnan Innovation Institute, Beihang University, Kunming 650233, China)

  • Ning Shen

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192, China)

  • Yujie Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192, China
    Research Center for Knowledge Management, Beijing 100192, China)

  • Kaiye Gao

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
    Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China)

Abstract

China’s economic development has achieved great success in recent years, but the problems of energy scarcity and environmental pollution have become increasingly serious. To enhance the reliability and efficiency between energy, the environment and the economy, sustainable development is an inevitable choice. In the context of measuring sustainability efficiency, a network data envelopment analysis model is proposed to formulate the two-stage process of energy use and operations management. A double frontier is derived to optimize the available energy for sustainable development. Due to nonlinearity, previous linear methods are not directly applicable to identify the double frontier and calculate stage efficiencies for inefficient decision-making units. To address this problem, this study develops the primal-dual relationship between multiplicative and envelopment network models based on the Lagrange duality principle of parametric linear programming. The newly developed approach is used to evaluate the sustainability efficiency of 30 administrative regions in China. The results show that insufficient sustainability efficiency is a systemic problem. Different regions should take different measures to conserve energy and reduce pollutant emissions for sustainable development. To increase sustainability efficiency, regions should support energy-saving and emission-reducing technologies in production processes and strengthen their capacity for technological innovation. Compared with energy use efficiency, operations management efficiency in China has a wider range of changes. During the operations management stage, there is not much difference between the capacity and quantity of each region. Based on benchmark regions at the efficiency frontier, there is an opportunity to improve operations management in the near future. Blockchain technology can effectively improve energy allocation efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Linyan Zhang & Chunhao Xu & Jian Zhang & Bingyin Lei & Anke Xie & Ning Shen & Yujie Li & Kaiye Gao, 2024. "An Innovative Double-Frontier Approach to Measure Sustainability Efficiency Based on an Energy Use and Operations Management Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:16:p:3972-:d:1453877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/16/3972/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/16/3972/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Jie & Zhu, Qingyuan & Ji, Xiang & Chu, Junfei & Liang, Liang, 2016. "Two-stage network processes with shared resources and resources recovered from undesirable outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 182-197.
    2. Kao, Chiang, 2017. "Efficiency measurement and frontier projection identification for general two-stage systems in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 679-689.
    3. Chen, Yao & Cook, Wade D. & Zhu, Joe, 2010. "Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 138-142, April.
    4. Chen, Yao & Cook, Wade D. & Kao, Chiang & Zhu, Joe, 2013. "Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 507-515.
    5. Oskar Juszczyk & Khuram Shahzad, 2022. "Blockchain Technology for Renewable Energy: Principles, Applications and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    6. John S. Liu & Louis Y. Y. Lu & Wen-Min Lu, 2016. "Research Fronts and Prevailing Applications in Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 543-574, Springer.
    7. Lim, Sungmook & Zhu, Joe, 2016. "A note on two-stage network DEA model: Frontier projection and duality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 342-346.
    8. Sebastián Lozano & Gabriel Villa, 2004. "Centralized Resource Allocation Using Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 143-161, July.
    9. Castelli, Lorenzo & Pesenti, Raffaele & Ukovich, Walter, 2004. "DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(2), pages 465-476, April.
    10. Chiang Kao, 2014. "Efficiency Decomposition in Network Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 55-77, Springer.
    11. Marco Schletz & Ana Cardoso & Gabriela Prata Dias & Søren Salomo, 2020. "How Can Blockchain Technology Accelerate Energy Efficiency Interventions? A Use Case Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    13. Liang Liang & Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu, 2008. "DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 643-653, October.
    14. Kao, Chiang & Hwang, Shiuh-Nan, 2008. "Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 418-429, February.
    15. Zhang, Linyan & Chen, Yao, 2018. "Equivalent solutions to additive two-stage network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1189-1191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chu, Junfei & Zhu, Joe, 2021. "Production scale-based two-stage network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 283-294.
    2. Zhang, Linyan & Chen, Kun, 2019. "Hierarchical network systems: An application to high-technology industry in China," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 118-131.
    3. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    4. Ang, Sheng & Liu, Pei & Yang, Feng, 2020. "Intra-Organizational and inter-organizational resource allocation in two-stage network systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Kao, Chiang, 2018. "Multiplicative aggregation of division efficiencies in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 328-336.
    6. Kao, Chiang, 2019. "Inefficiency identification for closed series production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 599-607.
    7. Chen, Ya & Li, Yongjun & Liang, Liang & Salo, Ahti & Wu, Huaqing, 2016. "Frontier projection and efficiency decomposition in two-stage processes with slacks-based measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 543-554.
    8. Wen, Yao & An, Qingxian & Gong, Yeming & Wu, Pengkun, 2024. "Structural rearrangement of the network system from an efficiency perspective: A silver lining of profit improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1001-1011.
    9. Kaffash, Sepideh & Azizi, Roza & Huang, Ying & Zhu, Joe, 2020. "A survey of data envelopment analysis applications in the insurance industry 1993–2018," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 801-813.
    10. Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris & Despotis, Dimitris K. & Kritikos, Manolis N., 2022. "Fair efficiency decomposition in network DEA: A compromise programming approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Li, Feng & Zhang, Danlu & Zhang, Jinyu & Kou, Gang, 2022. "Measuring the energy production and utilization efficiency of Chinese thermal power industry with the fixed-sum carbon emission constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    12. Antonio Peyrache & Maria C. A. Silva, 2022. "Efficiency and Productivity Analysis from a System Perspective: Historical Overview," Springer Books, in: Duangkamon Chotikapanich & Alicia N. Rambaldi & Nicholas Rohde (ed.), Advances in Economic Measurement, chapter 0, pages 173-230, Springer.
    13. Kao, Chiang, 2017. "Efficiency measurement and frontier projection identification for general two-stage systems in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 679-689.
    14. Joe Zhu, 2022. "DEA under big data: data enabled analytics and network data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 761-783, February.
    15. An, Qingxian & Chen, Haoxun & Xiong, Beibei & Wu, Jie & Liang, Liang, 2017. "Target intermediate products setting in a two-stage system with fairness concern," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 49-59.
    16. Lívia Mariana Lopes de Souza Torres & Francisco S. Ramos, 2024. "Are Brazilian Higher Education Institutions Efficient in Their Graduate Activities? A Two-Stage Dynamic Data-Envelopment-Analysis Cooperative Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-41, March.
    17. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    18. Lim, Dong-Joon & Kim, Moon-Su, 2022. "Measuring dynamic efficiency with variable time lag effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Zhu, Qingyuan & Xu, Shuqi & Sun, Jiasen & Li, Xingchen & Zhou, Dequn, 2022. "Energy efficiency evaluation of power supply system: A data-driven approach based on shared resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    20. Jianhui Xie & Qiwei Xie & Yongjun Li & Liang Liang, 2021. "Solving data envelopment analysis models with sum-of-fractional objectives: a global optimal approach based on the multiparametric disaggregation technique," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 453-480, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:16:p:3972-:d:1453877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.