IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i15p3660-d1442504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Reduction in the Process of Biological Denitrification by Choosing Traditional or Alternative Carbon Sources

Author

Listed:
  • Andrijana Brozinčević

    (Dr. Ivo Pevalek Scientific Research Centre, Plitvice Lakes National Park, Josipa Jovića 19, 53231 Plitvička Jezera, Croatia)

  • Dijana Grgas

    (Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierotti Str. 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Tea Štefanac

    (Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierotti Str. 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Mirna Habuda-Stanić

    (Faculty of Food Technology Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, F. Kuhača 18, 31000 Osijek, Croatia)

  • Bruno Zelić

    (Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Trg Marka Marulića 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Tibela Landeka Dragičević

    (Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierotti Str. 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Biological denitrification is a generally economically viable and reliable technology for nitrate (NO 3 − -N) and nitrite (NO 2 − -N) removal from wastewater. Nitrate/nitrite reduction requires an electron donor, which can be supplied from influent wastewater organic compounds, added as an external carbon source, or by endogenous respiration. Decisions regarding the selection of an external carbon source should take into consideration its cost, sludge generation quantity, the rate and efficiency of denitrification, and chemical storage safety. The expense of waste management and external carbon sources accounts for up to 50% of the overall cost of wastewater treatment. The carbon source characteristics required for biological denitrification affect the microbial community structure, denitrification rate, and intermediate products. This review is based on a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review providing information and insight into the topic of the denitrification process using different carbon sources. In this review, the main focus was on discussing alternative carbon sources vs. traditional carbon sources in terms of the carbon source price, C/N ratio, denitrification efficiency and rate, operational parameters, and advantages and disadvantages, as well as the limitations in the denitrification process. Future perspectives may include the operating parameters influencing the stability of the removal performance; the maintenance and improvement of nitrate removal; a study of the diversity of the microbial community; research on the application of new alternative carbon sources in denitrification; and N 2 O emission detection and minimisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrijana Brozinčević & Dijana Grgas & Tea Štefanac & Mirna Habuda-Stanić & Bruno Zelić & Tibela Landeka Dragičević, 2024. "Cost Reduction in the Process of Biological Denitrification by Choosing Traditional or Alternative Carbon Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-27, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:15:p:3660-:d:1442504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/15/3660/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/15/3660/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adouani, Nouceiba & Lendormi, Thomas & Limousy, Lionel & Sire, Olivier, 2010. "Effect of the carbon source on N2O emissions during biological denitrification," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(5), pages 299-302.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:15:p:3660-:d:1442504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.