IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i14p3397-d1432755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Oil Recovery Predictions by Leveraging Polymer Flooding Simulations and Machine Learning Models on a Large-Scale Synthetic Dataset

Author

Listed:
  • Timur Imankulov

    (National Engineering Academy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
    Department of Computer Science, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Yerzhan Kenzhebek

    (Department of Computer Science, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
    Joldasbekov Institute of Mechanics and Engineering, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)

  • Samson Dawit Bekele

    (National Engineering Academy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
    Department of Computer Science, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Erlan Makhmut

    (Department of Computer Science, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
    Joldasbekov Institute of Mechanics and Engineering, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Polymer flooding is a prominent enhanced oil recovery process that is widely recognized for its cost-effectiveness and substantial success in increasing oil production. In this study, the Buckley–Leverett mathematical model for polymer flooding was used to generate more than 163,000 samples that reflect different reservoir conditions using seven input parameters. We introduced artificial noise into the dataset to simulate real-world conditions and mitigate overfitting. Seven classic machine learning models and two neural networks were trained on this dataset to predict the oil recovery factor based on the input parameters. Among these, polynomial regression performed best with a coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.909, and the dense neural network and cascade-forward neural network achieved R 2 scores of 0.908 and 0.906, respectively. Our analysis included permutation feature importance and metrics analysis, where key features across all models were identified, and the model’s performance was evaluated on a range of metrics. Compared with similar studies, this research uses a significantly larger and more realistic synthetic dataset that explores a broader spectrum of machine learning models. Thus, when applied to a real dataset, our methodology can aid in decision-making by identifying key parameters that enhance oil production and predicting the oil recovery factor given specific parameter values.

Suggested Citation

  • Timur Imankulov & Yerzhan Kenzhebek & Samson Dawit Bekele & Erlan Makhmut, 2024. "Enhancing Oil Recovery Predictions by Leveraging Polymer Flooding Simulations and Machine Learning Models on a Large-Scale Synthetic Dataset," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:14:p:3397-:d:1432755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/14/3397/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/14/3397/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jestril Ebaga-Ololo & Bo Hyun Chon, 2017. "Prediction of Polymer Flooding Performance with an Artificial Neural Network: A Two-Polymer-Slug Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pablo Druetta & Francesco Picchioni, 2018. "Numerical Modeling and Validation of a Novel 2D Compositional Flooding Simulator Using a Second-Order TVD Scheme," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Olalekan Alade & Dhafer Al Shehri & Mohamed Mahmoud & Kyuro Sasaki, 2019. "Viscosity–Temperature–Pressure Relationship of Extra-Heavy Oil (Bitumen): Empirical Modelling versus Artificial Neural Network (ANN)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:14:p:3397-:d:1432755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.